arXiv:2608.20713v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Generative AI can now produce highly realistic images, yet current models still exhibit subtle but critical defects that undermine their reliability. W...
By Xiangfei Sheng, Weidong Zou, Tianjiao Gu, Zhichao Yang, Pengfei Chen, Leida Li
arXiv:2604. 26633v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Industrial surface defect inspection suffers from a fundamental data bottleneck: defects are rare, annotations require expert knowledge, and collecting balanced training sets is slow and costly.
By Paul Julius K\"uhn, Mika Pommeranz, Arjan Kuijper, Saptarshi Neil Sinha
arXiv:2606. 07953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-scale Visual-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural visual tasks, yet their application to industrial defect detection remains challenging due to two fundamental limitations: (i) the scarcity of large-scale industrial datasets that cover diverse defect categories across multiple domains, and (ii) the reliance on manual prompts (points, boxes, masks) that introduce subjective noise and lack text-visual interaction for fine-grained understanding.
By Zekai Zhang, Jinglin Zhang, Qinghui Chen, Gang Li, Da Chen, Shuainan Jing, He Wang, Dagang Li, Cong Liu, Cong Bai, Shengyong Chen
CF-YOLO introduces a real‑time detection framework for camouflaged micro‑defects on industrial components, combining a Context‑Perception Aggregation Module (CPAM) that fuses large‑kernel macro‑texture cues with small‑kernel boundary details, and a Feature Additive Refinement Module (FARM) that globally refines fine‑grained anomaly representations. The authors also release the Copper Tube Defect Dataset (CTDD), a benchmark of 1,847 images with 4,898 annotated defect boxes. Experiments show CF‑YOLO outperforms baseline detectors such as YOLOv11 by 2.2% in mAP@50 and 3.9% in Precision while preserving real‑time speed.
By Xinda Yu, Kunxin Zheng, Chunan Yu, Qingbo Song, Hao Xiao, Ying Zang, Jie Liu
The paper introduces ISP-AD, the largest publicly available industrial anomaly detection dataset, featuring both synthetic and real defects from a factory floor. It focuses on challenging, small, weakly contrasted surface defects within highly variable structured patterns, addressing the bias of existing datasets toward ideal imaging conditions. Experiments demonstrate that even a small amount of weakly labeled real defects improves model generalization and that synthetic defects can serve as a useful cold‑start baseline for scalable training.
By Paul J. Krassnig, Dieter P. Gruber
arXiv:2607. 27065v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While automated defect detection such as the detection of surface scratched is an important aspect in industrial quality control, the scarcity of annotated defect data make this task challenging.
By Paul Julius K\"uhn, Saptarshi Neil Sinha, Tiago Kleist, Richard Hoffmann, Arjan kuijper, Michael Weinmann
arXiv:2606. 23851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work investigates the implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for real-time monitoring in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing.
By Inioluwa Emmanuel, Zhuo Yang, Ho Yeung, Xinyao Zhang
arXiv:2608. 07770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated anomaly detection methods often report strong performance on curated academic benchmarks, but their behavior under real-world industrial conditions is less clear.
By Mike Szklarzewski, CJ George, Gavin Smithson, Christopher Stokes, Dakota Fulp, William M. Jones, Benjamin Wynn, Alexander Ur, Agit Yesiloz, Clint Kallenbach, Mark Swartz, Nathan DeBardeleben, Sharmistha Chakrabarti
arXiv:2607. 21577v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quality control in printing, particularly in rotogravure printing, still depends on slow, costly, and subjective manual inspection.
By Korota Ars\`ene Coulibaly, Mohamed Hamlich, Khalid Hmali, Andrea Trombin
arXiv:2606. 01023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual inspection remains the dominant quality-control practice in woven and tufted carpet production, yet it is slow, subjective, and inconsistent at the line speeds and widths of modern looms.
By Akbar Erkinov
MAOL (Morphology-Aware Ordinal Learning) is a new framework for fine-grained industrial defect severity grading. It treats severity grading as an instance-level ordinal learning task, uses explicit morphological features to improve representation, introduces class-conditional adaptive ordinal thresholds to capture defect-specific grading boundaries, and applies prediction-aware training with localization perturbation to handle noisy predicted instances. Experiments show MAOL outperforms rule-based methods, nominal classification models, and existing ordinal baselines, especially in predicted-instance settings, and it ranked third in the IDA 2026 Challenge on Fine-Grained Severity Grading for High-Precision Manufacturing.
By Zhaoyang Wang, Haiyong Chen, Binyi Su, Kun Liu, Kun Wang, Xianen Zhou, Atik Shahariar
Despite generating increasingly photorealistic images, text-to-image (T2I) models still exhibit localized, subtle, and structurally complex failures. Diagnosing these failures requires instance-level feedback that answers where a defect occurs, what type it is, why it is defective, and its importance to overall image quality.