arXiv Computer Vision

Evaluating the Safety of Deep Learning-Based Brain MRI Reconstruction

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Federated Learning for MRI-based BrainAGE: a multicenter study on post-stroke functional outcome prediction

arXiv:2506.15626v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: $\textbf{Objective:}$ Brain-predicted age difference (BrainAGE) is a neuroimaging biomarker reflecting brain health. However, training robust...

By Vincent Roca, Marc Tommasi, Paul Andrey, Aur\'elien Bellet, Markus D. Schirmer, Hilde Henon, Laurent Puy, Julien Ramon, Gr\'egory Kuchcinski, Martin Bretzner, Renaud Lopes
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 2

Image-Domain Poisson-Perturbation Robustness of NCCT Slice Classification

The study investigates how image‑domain Poisson perturbations affect the classification of ischemic core/penumbra in non‑contrast CT slices. Using a CPAISD cohort, the authors compared direct ResNet‑18 classification with a denoising‑then‑classifying pipeline and found that denoising generally reduced performance. A prospective experiment with joint denoising‑classification models showed no statistically significant advantage over direct noisy classification, indicating limited robustness to Poisson noise.

By Rhea Ghosal, Ronok Ghosal, Eileen Lou
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Multi-task learning for the automatic grading of enlarged perivascular space burden using MRI

arXiv:2609.37387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) visible in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly thought to be linked to poor brain health. PVS...

By Jesse Phitidis, William N. Whiteley, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Miguel O. Bernabeu, Yajun Cheng, Xiaodi Liu, Junfang Zhang, Una Clancy, Stephen Makin, Roberto Duarte Coello, Susana Mu\~noz Maniega, Mark E. Bastin, Simon R. Cox, Maria del C. Vald\'es Hern\'andez
arXiv AI
Oct 2

MIRTO: a registration-gated, multiverse-tested evaluation protocol for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MRI

MIRTO is an evaluation protocol for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MRI that explicitly documents key methodological choices—such as registration alignment, threshold setting, and false‑positive budgeting—and measures their impact. It applies a registration check, uses validation data for thresholding, reports realized false‑positive volumes, and repeats each comparison across 15,552 evaluation pipelines with bootstrap intervals. In a study on four UAD methods and 312 BraTS 2020 subjects, MIRTO revealed that an axis‑order mismatch dramatically lowered a diffusion model’s voxel AUROC, and that many performance differences were driven by lesion definition and threshold transfer rather than model quality.

By Negin Kafee Hernashki, Soumick Chatterjee
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 10

Recovering Lesion Parameters from Aphasic Picture Naming Error Profiles in Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 06429v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interpretability methods for large language models (LLMs) describe internal state but do not directly test whether that state is causally sufficient to produce the observed behavior.

By Yong Yang, Roger Newman-Norlund, Xiang Guan, Saeed Ahmadi, Regan Willis, Nadra Salman, Kalil Warren, Sophie Arheix-Parras, Srihari Nelakuditi, Leonardo Bonilha, Christopher Rorden, Rutvik H. Desai, Julius Fridriksson
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

Ischemic Stroke Segmentation and Net Water Uptake Quantification on Multicenter Non-Contrast CT Using Supervised Target-Domain Adaptation

This study presents a domain-aware deep learning framework based on nnU-Net for segmenting ischemic stroke lesions on non‑contrast CT scans and quantifying net water uptake (NWU). Trained on data from Hamburg and the Acute Ischemic Stroke Dataset, the model was fine‑tuned on small target‑domain subsets from Boston and ISLES, achieving median Dice scores of 0.68 and 0.56 for lesions ≥30 mL, and an NWU mean absolute error of 1.37 percentage points on the Boston cohort. The results demonstrate that target‑domain adaptation can enable accurate NCCT‑only infarct segmentation and low‑error NWU estimation across heterogeneous multicenter datasets.

By Linus Britt, Maximilian Nielsen, Susan Klapproth, Andre Kemmling, Michael H. Lev, Gabriel Broocks, Rene Werner, Thilo Sentker
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Deep Learning Segmentation of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Pragmatic Evaluation Across Three Datasets

The study evaluated a pragmatic deep‑learning approach for segmenting acute ischemic stroke lesions on diffusion‑weighted MRI. Using a self‑configured nnU‑Net trained on 1,744 cases and tested on 436, the baseline model achieved a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.84, outperforming the DeepISLES ensemble, especially for smaller infarcts. The approach required minimal preprocessing and fast inference, suggesting it could streamline clinical stroke imaging workflows.

By Atle Bj{\o}rnerud, Till Schellhorn, Thor H. Skatt{\o}r, Terje Nome, Jon Andr\'e Ottesen, Anne Hege Aamodt, Bradley J MacIntosh
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

The Diagnosis a Reporter Leaves Unspoken: Surfacing Frozen Tumor Features for Brain-Tumor MRI Reporting

The paper introduces NeuroFusion, an assistive brain‑MRI report generator that surfaces latent tumor signals from a frozen Mistral‑7B backbone. By adding discriminative field‑classifier heads over per‑lesion features, NeuroFusion restores accurate diagnoses (meningioma 0.92, metastasis 0.75) and improves prose quality while reducing latency 5–6×. A controlled negative result shows that overriding the decoder with a learned diagnosis pin harms performance, and grammar‑constrained decoding yields high schema‑validity (92.3%).

By Khawaja Murad ul Hassan, Ruqiyya Adil, Adil Qayyum, Rida Hassan, Asad Mansoor Khan, Muhammad Usman Akram, Mehran Ebrahimi
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Scores That Hold, Benchmarks That Leak: Measuring Dataset Contamination in Public Brain-Tumor MRI Classification

The paper examines dataset contamination in public brain‑tumor MRI classification benchmarks, introducing a three‑layer framework—duplicate, patient, and source‑label leakage—to evaluate integrity. Audits of the three most used corpora reveal severe leakage: up to 28.8% of test images duplicate training images, 22.3% are byte‑identical, and 95.5% share patients with training data. Even after removing all leaked images, model accuracy remains unchanged, indicating that benchmark integrity cannot be inferred from stable leaderboard scores alone.

By Bhanu Prakash Vangala, Sowmya Guda, Latha Peddi, Navya Vangala