arXiv:2608. 06429v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interpretability methods for large language models (LLMs) describe internal state but do not directly test whether that state is causally sufficient to produce the observed behavior.
arXiv:2608. 12717v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability of large language models lacks spatially resolved, falsifiable tools for testing whether internal components are specialized for distinct cognitive operations.
arXiv:2607. 11621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aphasia following stroke commonly produces systematic naming errors with characteristic profiles, but whether general-purpose language models not designed for clinical simulation can reproduce these patterns remains untested.
arXiv:2608.28714v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Objective: Deep learning accelerates brain MRI four- to tenfold, but models can erase lesions or synthesize false tissue - failures pixel-averaged me...
arXiv:2603.28387v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Trustworthy clinical AI must use real evidence and avoid relying on surface-level artifacts. We evaluate 12 open-weight vision-language model...
The study evaluates whether disease can be identified from reactive, non‑lesional brain tissue in intracranial biopsies. Using four foundation‑model encoders within an attention‑based multiple‑instance learning framework on 245 whole‑slide images, the authors find that disease labels remain predictive even after controlling for slide size and sampling bias, and that performance is similar across all encoders. Signed instance‑contribution maps and expert review confirm that predictive signals localize to reactive parenchyma rather than artifacts such as blood. "whyItMatters":"The findings demonstrate that weakly supervised models can recover disease signals from tissue traditionally considered non‑diagnostic, highlighting the need for provenance‑only baselines in computational pathology benchmarks."
arXiv:2609.37387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) visible in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly thought to be linked to poor brain health. PVS...
The paper investigates how medical vision‑language models (VLMs) behave when faced with distribution shifts such as changes in acquisition domain, supervision, or evaluation protocol. Using datasets like NIH ChestXray14, CheXpert, PadChest, and OpenI, the authors isolate cross‑dataset visual transfer, evaluate multimodal alignment, and quantify source‑proxy leakage in frozen embeddings. They find that self‑supervised visual initialization improves transfer, adversarial adaptation is only marginally helpful, and that multimodal retrieval performance drops under external stress tests while source‑proxy information remains recoverable, highlighting hidden failure modes in medical VLMs.
arXiv:2504. 06299v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal prediction models based on imaging and clinical data are increasingly used for clinical decision support, yet their interpretability remains limited.
arXiv:2603. 28387v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Trustworthy clinical AI requires that performance gains reflect genuine evidence integration rather than surface-level artifacts.
arXiv:2609.22271v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal stroke recurrence prediction requires effective integration of heterogeneous clinical and imaging data, yet modality imbalance often causes...
arXiv:2606.28798v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to propose a general framework for prediction based on different sources of multimodal data in the healthcare d...
arXiv:2608. 16507v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Due to the limited amount of information, modeling longitudinal rare-disease data can benefit from integrating clinical knowledge.