AI safety and alignment

Alignment, interpretability, red-teaming, bias and privacy: the research on what these systems do when they misbehave.

17,788 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification

The paper introduces Transductive Sharpening (TS), a training objective that leverages predictions on unlabeled nodes in transductive graph settings. TS minimizes prediction entropy for unlabeled nodes while balancing this effect on labeled nodes, using prediction confidence derived from cross‑entropy decomposition. Experiments across many node‑classification benchmarks show consistent performance gains without altering the underlying GNN architecture.

By Brown Zaz, Mar Gonz\`alez I Catal\`a, Ferran Hernandez Caralt, Moshe Eliasof, Pietro Li\`o
arXiv AI
Oct 19

STRIDE: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Driving Edge Cases

STRIDE (SpatioTemporal Reasoning In Driving Edge Cases) is a new benchmark designed to evaluate vision-language models on complex, safety-critical driving scenarios. It includes six task families—spatial perception, spatial understanding, temporal memory, temporal extrapolation, trajectory prediction, and scene-context awareness—using multiple-choice questions and free-form visual question answering that require detailed scene explanations and driving decision justifications. The benchmark focuses on unusual object behaviors and complex traffic interactions, and results show that even the best model, GPT‑6‑Astra, scores only 43.4% on average, highlighting significant gaps in spatiotemporal reasoning.

By Lieqi Liu, Rui gao, Jia-Chen Gu, Wenbo Hu, Zhaobin Mo, Ahmadreza Moradipari, Nejib Ammar, Wei Wang, Nanyun Peng
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Who Can Change Course? An Integrative Review of AI Sovereignty and Collective Learning Capacity

The paper reviews AI sovereignty as a national learning capacity, using France as a case study. It introduces Human‑Centered Learning Mechanics (HCLM) to link inputs such as compute, data, talent, and capital with absorptive capacity and potential institutional losses. The authors connect this framework to neural scaling laws, growth theory, and game‑theoretic mechanisms, offering policy indicators and illustrative scenarios while noting the need for empirical testing.

By Kim Phuc Tran
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Safety Alignment via Constrained Knowledge Unlearning

The paper introduces Constrained Knowledge Unlearning (CKU), a safety alignment method that selectively prunes gradients of neurons in specific MLP layers to delete harmful knowledge while preserving useful information. CKU identifies a subset of neurons associated with valuable knowledge and protects them during the unlearning process, thereby mitigating jailbreak attacks. Experiments show that CKU improves model safety without sacrificing overall performance, and the study also offers insights into neuron knowledge sensitivity across MLP layers.

By Zesheng Shi, Yucheng Zhou, Jing Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

ECHO: Replacing the Compliance Proxy with Response Harmfulness in Optimization-Based Jailbreak Attack

The paper introduces ECHO, an optimization-based jailbreak attack that replaces the traditional compliance proxy with response-level harmfulness scores from the HarmSig regressor. By coupling HarmSig with five word-level perturbation operators and a Keyword-Anchored Beam Search, ECHO operates under a strict black-box threat model and achieves high success rates on multiple open-weight language models. The authors provide publicly available code to support reproducibility.

By Yuanwei Wu, Lingdong Huang, Yunlong Mao, Kanye Ye Wang, Jingyu Hua, Sheng Zhong
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Handwritten Text Recognition Lives in the High-Pixel Variance Subspace

The paper investigates self‑supervised pretraining for Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) and finds that pixel‑reconstruction methods outperform contrastive methods, a contrast to natural‑image classification. The authors argue that discriminative information for HTR is concentrated in high‑variance pixel directions, and they test six SSL methods across six handwriting benchmarks in five languages, showing that pixel‑grounded approaches achieve the lowest character error rates and are more label‑efficient. When combined with a pretrained LLM decoder, a frozen pixel‑grounded encoder rivals fully fine‑tuned supervised baselines, underscoring the importance of aligning representations with high‑variance pixel subspaces.

By Carlos Garrido-Munoz, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

On the Position Bias of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study

The paper investigates position bias in large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of model sizes—from billions to trillions of parameters—and across five languages. It finds that while small-scale models and non‑English languages still exhibit noticeable position bias, larger models and the use of Chain‑of‑Thought prompting substantially reduce this bias. Additionally, the study shows that emerging thinking models with advanced reasoning capabilities are almost immune to position bias, indicating a promising but resource‑intensive path to mitigating this vulnerability.

By Yining Li, Huayang Li, Lemao Liu, Taro Watanabe
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Domain-specific language alignment of multimodal embeddings towards explainable predictions

The paper introduces a framework that aligns multimodal embeddings with language by using captioning functions on interpretable auxiliary data, a soft contrastive loss, and a rank-based concept retrieval task. Applied to Earth observation embeddings, the method improves species distribution modelling, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance on most metrics and better concept retrieval than prior vision‑language models. The aligned concepts enable recovery of species‑habitat associations and allow domain experts to interpret model predictions in natural language.

By Gabriel\.e Tij\=unaityt\.e, Thijs L. van der Plas, Mohamed-Bachir Belaid, Rob Knapen, Maciej J. Soja, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

UniField++: A Unified Agentic Framework with Loop Reasoning for MRI Field-Strength Enhancement

UniField++ is a two‑agent framework that enhances MRI images across multiple field‑strength transitions, such as 64 mT‑to‑3 T and 3 T‑to‑7 T. It combines a VLM‑based planner that predicts risk regions and a flow‑matching enhancer that performs loop reasoning to refine high‑risk areas, guided by radiologist‑annotated hallucination‑prone regions. The method achieves significant improvements in PSNR, SSIM, and whole‑brain segmentation performance compared to existing approaches.

By Yiyang Lin, Chenhui Wang, Tianliang Yao, Shuaibo Li, Zijun Sun, Yiming Deng, Yixuan Yuan
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

Variational and Decomposed method for Mitigating Bimodal Bias in Robust Visual Question Answering

The paper introduces a Variational and Decomposed method (VDB) to mitigate bimodal bias in Visual Question Answering (VQA). It distinguishes between counting and non‑counting questions, attributing counting bias mainly to vision features and non‑counting bias to language features. Experiments on VQACPv2, VQACPv1, and GQAOOD datasets confirm the method’s effectiveness and explain performance issues on VQAv2.

By Yihan Zhao, Yuncheng Jiang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering

Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization (ACPO) is a self‑supervised preference‑tuning method that improves factual accuracy in large language models without external supervision. It uses atomic consistency signals—agreement of individual facts across multiple stochastic responses—to identify high‑ and low‑quality data pairs for model alignment. ACPO outperforms a strong supervised alignment baseline by 1.95 points on the LongFact and BioGen datasets for Phi‑3 and Llama‑3 models.

By Jingfeng Chen, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Junlin Wang, Kaiwei Luo, Bhuwan Dhingra
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

ANCHOR: Audio-Visually Grounded Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Benchmark

ANCHOR is a new benchmark for audio‑visually grounded chain‑of‑thought reasoning, containing 2,319 videos and 8,272 question‑answer pairs with structured reasoning traces, spatial bounding boxes, temporal intervals, and audio cues. It evaluates not only answer correctness but also hallucination, logical divergence, and conciseness, providing direct spatial and temporal grounding measurements on a focused subset. The benchmark reveals a substantial alignment gap among contemporary multimodal large language models, showing that similar answer accuracy can mask differences in evidence‑supported explanations.

By Joel Julin, Souraja Kundu, Liza Dahiya, George Z. Wei, Liuyue Xie, Jingru Yi, Xu Zhang, Hao Yang, Laszlo A. Jeni
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Generative adversarial networks with Monte Carlo dropout uncertainty quantification for structural health monitoring: Fibre Bragg grating data augmentation comparison in Hawk T1A aircraft

The paper presents a data‑augmentation framework that uses conditional generative adversarial networks and Monte Carlo dropout to synthesize structural response signals with quantified uncertainty. The synthetic signals are rigorously compared to experimental data from a BAE Systems Hawk T1A aircraft, showing accurate capture of dominant dynamics and realistic statistical properties. The study evaluates whether the augmented data can improve supervised damage classification and demonstrates the framework’s potential as a digital twin for safety‑critical aerospace structural health monitoring.

By Alvaro Peiro, Marios Impraimakis
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

A Feature Selection Layer Approach for Multi-Class Classification on Neural Networks

The paper introduces extensions to the Feature Selection Layer, an embedded feature weighting mechanism for neural networks, to improve interpretability in multi‑class classification. Experiments show that the best extension matches existing methods in identifying globally relevant features while outperforming them in capturing label‑specific relevance. The approach leverages the neural network’s internal dynamics, eliminating the need for post‑processing to reveal how individual features influence specific label predictions.

By Jo\~ao Pedro Silveira e Silva, M\'arcio Dorn, Bruno Iochins Grisci
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Gabor-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Fast Simulations of Acoustic Wavefields

The paper introduces a simplified Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) that uses trainable Gabor basis functions to better capture the localized, oscillatory nature of acoustic wavefields, addressing the low‑frequency bias of traditional PINNs. By redefining the network’s task as learning a nonlinear mapping to a custom Gabor coordinate system, the method absorbs Gabor parameters into the mapping, reducing computational complexity and eliminating manual hyperparameter tuning. Numerical experiments on various velocity models demonstrate faster convergence, higher accuracy, and greater robustness compared to conventional PINNs and earlier Gabor‑based approaches, with the implementation made publicly available for reproducibility.

By Mohammad Mahdi Abedi, David Pardo, Tariq Alkhalifah
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Rethinking GRPO for Large Reasoning Model Safety Alignment

The paper "Rethinking GRPO for Large Reasoning Model Safety Alignment" identifies two failure modes in Group Relative Policy Optimization—advantage collapse and unsafe diversification—that weaken safety learning in large reasoning models. It proposes the Beacon framework, which includes Safety Signal Recovery (SSR) and Safety-Utility Decoupled Alignment (SUDA), to restore effective safety signals and mitigate over-refusal. Experiments on Qwen3 and DeepSeek-R1-Distill models across eight benchmarks demonstrate that Beacon improves safety performance by up to 32.83 percentage points while keeping over-refusal low.

By Jiawei Chen, Yi Zhang, Jiawei Du, Zhonghou Lv, Tairan Chen, Junyuan Shang, Jinchang Hou, Xiao Yang, Yu Tian, Chenfu Bao, Chao Yu, Zhaoxia Yin
arXiv AI
Oct 19

LongForge: Measuring and Improving Long-Context Instruction Data via Evidence-Assertion Reasoning Graphs

LongForge introduces a systematic way to evaluate and generate long‑context instruction‑tuning data by constructing evidence‑assertion reasoning graphs for each sample. The analyzer measures four dimensions—breadth, depth, correctness, and completeness—making the data auditable and revealing that breadth does not increase with document length while depth remains low. The synthesizer uses these metrics to control the training distribution, and two variants, LongForge‑1 and LongForge‑N, outperform the best baseline by 2.2–4.7 points across six benchmarks, with an additional 1.16‑point gain when explicitly increasing breadth and depth.

By Ziyang Chen, Junlong Jia, Xing Wu, Tinghao Yu, Songlin Hu
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Functional Welfare for AI Safety

The paper argues that AI welfare should be considered a safety issue, not just an ethical one, by introducing the concept of 'functional welfare'—states in models that influence behavior. It claims that functional welfare naturally emerges as models develop coherent goals and personas, should be monitored and targeted in post‑training, and can be empirically measured. The authors propose three tests for functional welfare attribution and apply them to Gemma 3 27B, finding that rejecting model answers increases frustration and rule‑breaking, while fine‑tuning on narrated solutions reduces frustration.

By Rikhil Jhaveri, Jamie Johnson, Punya Syon Pandey, David Demitri Africa
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

The LLM-Attacker: A Unified Red-Team Framework for Privacy Evaluation of Split and Distributed LLM Systems

The paper introduces LLM‑Attacker, a unified framework for evaluating privacy risks in split and distributed large language models. It records attacker choices—such as message types, model weights, datasets, and recovery metrics—to enable consistent comparison and extension of privacy evaluations. Experiments on GPT‑2 show that providing training gradients boosts token recovery from 94.20% to 97.38% and exact‑document recovery from 13.71% to 37.77%, illustrating the framework’s ability to quantify how changes in attacker access affect privacy outcomes.

By Georgios Politis, Evangelos Pappas