arXiv:2608. 01085v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) extend LLM capabilities through iterative communication and shared contexts.
arXiv:2606. 07963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Backdoor attacks in large language models (LLMs) are often treated as isolated trigger-response failures, motivating defenses tailored to specific triggers or behaviors.
arXiv:2605. 01133v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) enable agents to communicate and share information, achieving strong performance on complex tasks.
The paper investigates whether hidden representations in latent-based multi‑agent systems can carry attack information that remains effective during normal operation. A latent attack framework is introduced, reactivating attack effects through latent interventions without using adversarial text. Experiments show that these latent attacks can significantly degrade task performance, especially when targeting inter‑agent KV‑cache handoffs, and that the degradation cannot be explained by simple perturbations or invalid generation.
arXiv:2603. 21194v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent discussions have been widely adopted, motivating growing efforts to develop attacks that expose their vulnerabilities.
arXiv:2607. 06807v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While enabling effective collaboration on complex tasks, LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) face critical security challenges due to vulnerabilities at the agent and interaction levels.
arXiv:2608. 02657v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic LLMs are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks, e.
arXiv:2607. 24893v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems can be attacked by a payload that no single agent ever holds in full: a poisoned tool hides encrypted fragments in its observations, spreads them across several agents, and an external step reassembles and executes them after the run.
arXiv:2605. 01143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents demonstrate strong capabilities in autonomous task execution, tool use, and multi-step reasoning.
arXiv:2606. 12737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into agentic systems that interact with external tools and environments, introducing new security risks such as indirect prompt injection attacks through untrusted external sources.
The paper proposes universal, tool‑based defenses for large language model agents that use external tools, addressing four types of adversarial attacks: direct and indirect prompt injection, memory poisoning, and backdoor attacks. Two main defenses are introduced: Attacker Tool Filtering, which uses anomaly detection to remove suspicious tools, and Normal Tool Recalling, which restores the agent’s original toolset before planning. The authors also add prompt‑based defenses such as Chain‑of‑Thought prompting and self‑reflection, and demonstrate that these methods dramatically lower attack success rates—often to 0%—across multiple open‑source and proprietary LLMs while maintaining or improving task performance.
arXiv:2609.14060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantization is one of the default deployment paths for open-weight LLM agents, but it is not behavior-preserving: an adversary can release a full-pr...
arXiv:2609.00595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe agents can fail together. Multi-agent LLM systems (MAS) move information, state, decisions, and authority across principal boundaries, creating...