arXiv Machine Learning

Mammography Foundation Models for Opportunistic Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

The study evaluates whether mammography foundation models, pretrained for breast cancer tasks, can predict 5‑year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in women using only screening mammograms. In a cohort of 22,497 women (500 MACE events), the models achieved AUROCs of 0.823 and 0.822, outperforming an age‑only baseline. The models also identified higher risk in patients with radiologist‑documented breast arterial calcifications, despite never being trained on that label.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models

The study audited ten different classifiers—including linear, tree‑ensemble, neural, glass‑box, and tabular foundation models—on national health survey data to predict myocardial infarction. By systematically removing features that could cause target leakage, the authors found that all models’ AUROC scores collapsed into a narrow band, indicating that reported high accuracy in prior work was largely due to leakage rather than model sophistication. The glass‑box explainable boosting machine performed comparably to other models while being much faster, and the authors demonstrated that fairness, calibration, and uncertainty can be audited and repaired without sacrificing performance.

By Raad Bin Tareaf, Murad Al-Rajab, Samia Loucif, Samer Ellaham, Cedric Schmitz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Longitudinal Risk Prediction in Mammography with Privileged History Distillation

The paper introduces SEM‑HD, a framework that leverages longitudinal mammography history as privileged information during training to improve risk prediction while requiring only a single current exam at inference. By having a student model predict latent representations of past visits and using teacher supervision from actual longitudinal data, SEM‑HD preserves temporal modeling benefits without needing prior exams at deployment. Experiments on three cohorts and two backbone architectures show consistent gains in long‑horizon AUC and pAUC, especially in low false‑positive‑rate regions, and recover much of the performance gap to full‑history models.

By Banafsheh Karimian, Soufiane Belharbi, Alexis Guichemerre, Luke McCaffrey, Mohammadhadi Shateri, Eric Granger
arXiv AI
Jul 14

Longitudinal Multi-View Breast Cancer Risk Prediction

arXiv:2607. 11343v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate breast cancer risk prediction from screening mammography is critical for enabling personalized screening intervals and early detection.

By Solveig Thrun, Zijun Sun, Suaiba A. Salahuddin, Kristoffer Wickstr{\o}m, Elisabeth Wetzer, Stine Hansen, Robert Jenssen, Michael Kampffmeyer
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12

BreastMammo and DenseMammo: Benchmarks for Mammography Domain Generalization

arXiv:2608. 10271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast density classification is a critical component of breast cancer risk assessment, yet AI models often struggle to generalize across clinical sites due to vendor-specific acquisition styles.

By Hongyi Pan, Gorkem Durak, Halil Ertugrul Aktas, Andrea Mia Bejar, Mustafa Ege Seker, Nebile Alibeyoglu, Rumeysa Guclu, Rana Gunoz Comert Bozkurt, Sibel Ozkan Gurdal, Neslihan Cabioglu, Beyza Ozcinar, Ravza Yilmaz, Vahit Ozmen, Erkin Aribal, Sukru Mehmet Erturk, Yalda Zafari, Mohamed Mabrok, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Mohammad Yaqub, Ziyue Xu, Ulas Bagci
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Fine-tuning an ECG Foundation Model to Predict Coronary CT Angiography Outcomes

A multicenter study developed an AI-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) model that predicts vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) as the reference. The model demonstrated strong discrimination in internal and external cohorts, including normal ECGs, and produced low-, intermediate-, and high-risk strata that correlated with stenosis severity and major adverse cardiovascular events. Calibration, decision curve analyses, and integration with guideline-based pre-test probability showed clinical utility, while waveform and attribution analyses revealed physiologically meaningful ECG features linked to high-risk predictions.

By Yujie Xiao, Qinghao Zhao, Gongzheng Tang, Hao Zhang, Zhuoran Kan, Deyun Zhang, Jun Li, Guangkun Nie, Xiaocheng Fang, Haoyu Wang, Shun Huang, Tong Liu, Jian Liu, Kangyin Chen, Shenda Hong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 1

EchoRisk: A Multicentre Echocardiography Dataset and Benchmark for Cardio-Oncology

Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity is the leading non-oncological cause of treatment interruption in breast cancer patients, yet early, automated risk stratification from routine cardiac imaging remains an unsolved problem. We present EchoRisk, the first curated, multicentre, longitudinal echocardiography dataset with explicit cardiotoxicity labels, released as the primary technical reference for the EchoRisk-MICCAI 2026 challenge.

arXiv AI
Jul 2

EchoRisk: A Multicentre Echocardiography Dataset and Benchmark for Cardio-Oncology

arXiv:2607. 01039v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity is the leading non-oncological cause of treatment interruption in breast cancer patients, yet early, automated risk stratification from routine cardiac imaging remains an unsolved problem.

By Grigorios Kalliatakis, Georgia Karanasiou, Georgios Manikis, Manolis Tsiknakis, Dimitrios Fotiadis, Dorothea Tsekoura, Kalliopi Keramida, Vasileios Bouratzis, Lampros Lakkas, Katerina Naka, Andri Papakonstantinou, Anastasia Constantinidou, Kostas Marias
arXiv AI
Aug 5

CorePath: A Breast-Specialized Pathology Foundation Model for Core Needle Biopsy Diagnosis and Risk-Controlled Report Generation

arXiv:2608. 03079v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is central to breast cancer diagnosis yet remains challenging because limited tissue sampling, lesion heterogeneity, and subtle morphologic overlap can obscure subtype distinctions.

By Ting Yin, Danning Li, Chen Shu, Xiaoxia Yao, Boyu Fu, Yujing Chang, Tianyu Shi, Mengna Feng, Jie Chen, Jing Fu, Xiuli Xiao, Tianlin Li, Mumin Shao, Jiaxin Bi, Wenchuan Zhang, Xiaoyan Wu, Xiao Han, Zhang Zhang, Yuhao Yi, Hong Bu