Foundation model embeddings of screening mammograms may encode pre-diagnostic tissue change without task-specific adaptation. We tested whether embeddings move faster along a data-derived "cancer dire...
arXiv:2609.26443v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems have substantially improved breast cancer screening, dia...
By Farnoush Bayatmakou, Maryam Hosseini, Reza Taleei, Arash Mohammadi
arXiv:2608.24688v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Precision oncology necessitates a longitudinal model of patient state that captures cancer evolution and treatment over time, integrating multimodal ob...
By Eugene Vorontsov, Yi Kan Wang, Alican Bozkurt, Adam Casson, Ludmila Tydlitatova, Michal Zelechowski, Ezra E. W. Cohen, Jyoti D. Patel, Max Banaszak, Caitlin McWilliams, Shane Colley, Kate Sasser, Ryan Fukushima, Eric Lefkofsky, Razik Yousfi, Siqi Liu
The paper introduces SEM‑HD, a framework that leverages longitudinal mammography history as privileged information during training to improve risk prediction while requiring only a single current exam at inference. By having a student model predict latent representations of past visits and using teacher supervision from actual longitudinal data, SEM‑HD preserves temporal modeling benefits without needing prior exams at deployment. Experiments on three cohorts and two backbone architectures show consistent gains in long‑horizon AUC and pAUC, especially in low false‑positive‑rate regions, and recover much of the performance gap to full‑history models.
By Banafsheh Karimian, Soufiane Belharbi, Alexis Guichemerre, Luke McCaffrey, Mohammadhadi Shateri, Eric Granger
arXiv:2607. 10358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly used as image feature extractors for mammography, but their robustness under external domain shift remains unclear.
By Giang Nguyen, Raghav Mehta, Emma A. M. Stanley, Tian Xia, Thi Hao Nguyen, Hieu Pham, Ben Glocker
The study evaluates whether mammography foundation models, pretrained for breast cancer tasks, can predict 5‑year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in women using only screening mammograms. In a cohort of 22,497 women (500 MACE events), the models achieved AUROCs of 0.823 and 0.822, outperforming an age‑only baseline. The models also identified higher risk in patients with radiologist‑documented breast arterial calcifications, despite never being trained on that label.
By Paula Feldman, Nusrat Binta Nizam, Sunwoo Kwak, Batuhan Karaman, Katerina Dodelzon, Mert Sabuncu