arXiv:2609.22383v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) methods address treatment endogeneity, but with non-compliance and heterogeneous treatment effects a binary instrument gen...
By Zixuan Yao, Guosheng Yin
arXiv:2606. 01184v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean: they can split a population into disconnected regimes, create loops or holes, generate branches, or reorganize an outcome cloud while leaving the average response nearly unchanged.
By Usef Faghihi
arXiv:2609.36046v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: In spatial observational studies, treatment assignment and outcomes often exhibit spatial dependence patterns, and treatment effects may vary across...
By Shuren He, Huiyan Sang, Ligang Lu
The paper introduces GeoACE, a five‑expert framework for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects that blends a common anchor‑correction estimator with overlap‑aware and outcome‑guided geometries. The ensemble’s task‑level weights are learned from internal validation predictions, frozen before test evaluation, and applied to experts refitted on the full development data. Adding the outcome‑free, overlap‑aware expert O‑Phi‑ACE consistently improves performance across seven benchmarks, achieving the lowest average rank among 11 comparators.
By Ali Haghpanah Jahromi, Mohammad Taheri
arXiv:2607. 13508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantifying directional influence between node populations is a fundamental problem in graph-based modeling, particularly in spatial biological systems where cell-cell interactions shape functional outcomes.
By Humaira Anzum, Md Ishtyaq Mahmud, Jagan Mohan Reddy Dwarampudi, Tania Banerjee
arXiv:2608. 19383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Average dose-response functions are widely used to summarize causal effects of continuous treatments, but most existing methods assume that the observed sample represents the target population.
By Jay Jojo Cheng, Guanhua Chen
arXiv:2607. 26599v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is central to targeted interventions, such as personalized promotions and precision medicine.
By Jialu Xu, Mengkun Liang, Guannan Liu, Xiaojie Mao, Junjie Wu
arXiv:2603. 19186v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects, yet they are often underpowered for detecting effect heterogeneity.
By Amir Asiaee, Samhita Pal
arXiv:2607. 26521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional subgroup analyses can yield unstable and difficult-to-interpret conclusions, especially in observational biomedical data where each individual is observed under only one exposure state, true individual treatment effects are unavailable, and causal structure is uncertain.
By Vasundhara Acharya, Bulent Yener
Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is central to targeted interventions, such as personalized promotions and precision medicine. We focus on the conditional average treatment effect (CATE), a standard estimand for characterizing such heterogeneity.
arXiv:2609.15254v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Conformal counterfactual prediction constructs prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees for counterfactual outcomes and individual trea...
By Matteo Zecchin, Osvaldo Simeone
arXiv:2505. 17961v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Causal inference typically assumes centralized access to individual-level data.
By R\'emi Khellaf, Aur\'elien Bellet, Julie Josse