Inference for Causal Path-Specific Effects in Longitudinal Studies with Repeated Treatments and Multiple Mediators
Read the original on arXiv Statistics ML →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Statistics ML.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Statistics ML.
The paper introduces new one‑step and targeted minimum loss‑based estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under the front‑door criterion. These estimators use multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, can avoid modeling the mediator density, and are compatible with flexible machine‑learning nuisance estimation. The authors derive conditions for root‑n consistency, asymptotic linearity, and develop doubly robust tests for identification assumptions, demonstrating improved efficiency and favorable performance in simulations and real‑world applications in education and emergency medicine.
arXiv:2105. 09254v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In many applications, researchers are interested in the direct and indirect causal effects of a treatment or exposure on an outcome of interest.
The paper introduces PICLE-PFN, a foundation model for longitudinal causal effect estimation that handles dynamic treatment policies. It represents policies via in-context history-decision demonstrations and is pretrained on synthetic data from longitudinal structural causal models, enabling it to predict conditional average potential outcomes in a single forward pass without task-specific training. Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks show competitive RMSE and better uncertainty calibration while reducing deployment runtime compared to conventional estimators.
The paper investigates how learned multimodal representations of high‑dimensional health data can fail to preserve causal information, even when trained to reconstruct the data. It establishes conditions under which a representation is sufficient for causal identification, shows that interventional mediation requires stricter preservation than counterfactual comparison, and proves that reconstruction‑based objectives cannot certify sufficiency. The authors decompose the error of cross‑fitted doubly robust estimators into a first‑order representation bias and a second‑order nuisance‑estimation remainder, demonstrating that coverage can deteriorate with larger samples if the representation is insufficient. They propose a practical workflow that combines modality‑specific variational autoencoders, cross‑fitted doubly robust estimation, locked phenotypes, selective pathway analysis, portable representations, and diagnostics for representation insufficiency, exposure leakage, and sensitivity, and validate it in simulations where a rare confounder’s omission leads to severely under‑covered indirect‑effect intervals.
The paper introduces Neural ODE-LMM, a hybrid model that integrates a Neural Ordinary Differential Equation into a linear mixed‑effects framework to flexibly learn time‑varying associations between exposures and outcomes. By encoding covariate trajectories into a continuous‑time latent state, the method preserves standard likelihood inference while capturing complex, potentially cumulative effects without pre‑specifying functional forms. Simulations demonstrate accurate recovery of instantaneous and cumulative effects, and application to the 3C cohort uncovers BMI and fasting glucose trajectories linked to cognitive decline.
arXiv:2609.22383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) methods address treatment endogeneity, but with non-compliance and heterogeneous treatment effects a binary instrument gen...