arXiv:2603. 14169v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Average treatment effects (ATE) and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) are foundational causal estimands, but they target changes in expected outcomes and can miss treatment-induced changes in the shape of outcome distributions.
By Amir Saki, Usef Faghihi
arXiv:2606. 00754v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce causal density functions: Radon-Nikodym derivatives that compare interventional laws to observational laws and therefore act as local density ratios for causal effects.
By Sridhar Mahadevan
arXiv:2609.06294v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) enables efficient targeting of interventions, but many applications have limited experimental s...
By Maitreyi Swaroop, Shikha Bhat, Samantha Rodriguez, Tamar Krishnamurti, Bryan Wilder
arXiv:2604. 23904v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Synthetic tabular data are often evaluated by distributional similarity, privacy distance, or train-on-synthetic-test-on-real predictive performance, but these criteria do not ensure validity for causal inference.
By Yichen Xu
GeoDose-CP introduces a graph‑local conformal inference framework for estimating localized stochastic potential outcomes when dealing with continuous or mixed continuous‑atomic treatments in Earth observation data. The method jointly models intervention‑induced treatment shifts, outcome‑scale Jacobians, and spatial residual dependence, and includes exact weighted candidate inversion, a scalable sparse approximation, and a refusal mechanism for inadequate support. Evaluation on controlled experiments, MineDoseBench, and a multi‑mine study in New South Wales demonstrates high selective coverage and identifies limitations when longitudinal treatment data are unavailable.
By Md Khalid Hasan Sakib, Dristi Datta, Manoranjan Paul, Davina White
arXiv:2606. 19610v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work on Kan-Do-Calculus (KDC) has established that the boundary between passive observation and active intervention in causal inference is a category-theoretic bi-adjunction, with interventions modeled by left Kan extensions and conditioning by right Kan extensions.
By Sridhar Mahadevan