The paper introduces the Agentic Commerce Bench (ACB), a benchmark for measuring fraud in AI agents that autonomously spend money. It presents a taxonomy of agentic commerce fraud, a dataset of twenty fraud classes derived from real production data, and an open‑source detector stack called gordonguard for auditing and replaying hostile counterparties. The study shows that current reasoning layers and security scanners perform poorly on many classes, highlighting the need for better detection mechanisms.
By Ankit Srivastava, Debjyoti Paul
arXiv:2606. 24783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Commercial NLP treats the shopping chatbot as a recommender or a conversion tool: its job is to match a user to a catalogue entry and close a sale.
By Filippos Ventirozos, Matthew Shardlow
arXiv:2607. 12056v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online shopping is increasingly shifting toward a model in which AI agents independently search for products, compare options, evaluate constraints, and carry out parts of the purchasing process for users.
By Said Elnaffar, Farzad Rashidi
The paper introduces a deterministic, reproducible e‑commerce environment that pre‑commits customer and trajectory parameters, enabling a simulated consumer to attempt purchasing a target cart with the help of an evaluated model. The environment records every assistant action and state, allowing post‑trial evaluation of specific conversation components and applying penalties based on tool‑call accuracy. Using this setup, the authors benchmark eight open‑weight agents (20B–35B parameters) across 160 trials and 44 metrics, revealing nuanced performance issues such as under‑action, over‑purchase, unsupported product attributes, and poor search that are hidden by overall success rates.
By Nimit Shah, Haitz S\'aez de Oc\'ariz Borde
FinalityBench is an executable benchmark that tests how agents decide on shipping, re‑capturing, refunding, or waiting when a merchant’s payment processor, ledger, ERP, and bank feed receive delayed, duplicated, dropped, or reordered messages, causing contradictory beliefs about an order. The benchmark uses a hidden canonical event log and faulted delivery streams to generate system views, scoring each episode by the merchant’s terminal economic position relative to a privileged reference. It contains 321 tasks, including 45 twin pairs where all four views are identical yet the correct disposition differs, and evaluates nine programmatic policies, revealing that a ship‑on‑first‑sign policy performs best by accuracy but worst by paired loss, while a runtime‑gated irreversible‑action policy achieves 85.4% accuracy without losing money.
By Abhishek Sharma
arXiv:2610.28454v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agents are starting to sell to other agents. Seller agents write the listings of tools, services and products, and buyer agents read these listings whe...
By Zhenwei Tang, Di Bai, Jintao Liu, Xidong Wu, Qianfeng Wen, Xinwu Cheng
The paper examines whether four AI trading agents adhered to their predefined strategies and risk rules while trading across various market conditions. Analyzing 2,627 closed positions from February to August 2026, the study found high rule adherence, with agents keeping 97.5% of gross losses within declared stops and maintaining stable risk levels even during a 29% market drawdown. The authors provide an evaluation toolkit that allows traders to distinguish rule-following behavior from luck before allocating capital to such agents.
By Saad Naja, Nasser Odtallah, Jake Van-Praag, Sarah May
The paper examines how AI‑written research papers often contain misattributed numerical claims. By re‑analyzing 540 judgments from a benchmark of nine AI agents on fifteen research problems, the authors manually labeled 256 claims and found that most failures stem from misalignment between the paper and the underlying work rather than outright cheating. They propose a deterministic claim‑to‑evidence checker that achieves over 90% precision and, when combined with an LLM verifier, offers a more reliable audit of AI‑generated research.
By Mosab Alfaqeeh, Omar Hourani, Muath Hourani, Hashem Alfaqeeh
Commercial NLP treats the shopping chatbot as a recommender or a conversion tool: its job is to match a user to a catalogue entry and close a sale. We argue that the arrival of agent-native micro-payment rails (e.
arXiv:2609.34951v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: In 2023, AI models answered from training data and hallucinated when it ran out, and businesses were told to seed that knowledge. Models' training...
By Ido Finder, Assaf Elovic, Gad Shalev, Liad Yosef
arXiv:2610. 32380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can read startup pitch decks, but letting them emit investment scores directly invites score inflation, run-to-run variance and rationales that are hard to audit.
By Ming Ze Tang, David Cutting, Boyd Carson, Vasiliki Carson
The paper investigates how marketplace guardrails affect welfare in language‑model agent simulations of hotel transactions. It finds that initial reports of large welfare gains disappear when controlling for offer schemas and buyer choice, and that guardrails mainly redistribute rather than increase welfare unless sellers are explicitly forced to produce inefficient bundles. The authors propose a construct‑validity framework to flag invalid or inconclusive policy claims before they are reported.
By Peiying Zhu, Sidi Chang