Large language models

Model releases, architecture work and prompting research on large language models — from frontier-lab announcements to the arXiv papers behind them.

21,545 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Jul 14

VehAnchor: Metadata-Free Metric Scale Recovery from Vehicle Cues in Aerial Imagery

arXiv:2603. 04277v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous aerial robots operating in GPS-denied or communication-degraded environments frequently lose access to camera metadata and telemetry, leaving onboard perception systems unable to recover the absolute metric scale of the scene.

By Yifei Chen, Chenqian Le, Jiayi Cheng, Xupeng Chen
arXiv AI
Jul 14

The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy

arXiv:2607. 11175v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growing ability of large language models and vision language models to jointly interpret and reason over images and text is reshaping medical agents, moving them from task specific predictors toward autonomous systems that perceive, reason, plan, remember, and act in clinical environments.

By Chunzheng Zhu, Lei Tian, Bohan Tan, Ziqi Zhou, Yuxuan Sun, Yijun Wang, Chengchao Lv, Yilin Wen, Yijun He, Jinghao Lin, Yihang Chen, Cheewei Tan, Qianshan Wei, Lei Zhao, Bin Pu, Kenli Li, Yuan Xue, Jianxin Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Low-Rank Attention Residuals

arXiv:2607. 09694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Attention Residuals replace the fixed residual sum with depthwise attention over previous sub-layer outputs in large language models (LLMs), but use each output as both a full-dimensional key and value.

By Jonathan Su
arXiv AI
Jul 14

Recursive Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv:2604. 25917v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recursive or looped language models have recently emerged as a new scaling axis by iteratively refining the same model computation over latent states to deepen reasoning.

By Jiaru Zou, Rui Pan, Ruizhong Qiu, Pan Lu, Shizhe Diao, Jindong Jiang, Hanghang Tong, Tong Zhang, Markus J. Buehler, Jingrui He, James Zou
arXiv AI
Jul 14

LLMs as a Jury: Cross-Model Consensus Can Outperform Process Reward Models for LLM Reasoning

arXiv:2607. 10139v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Selecting the correct answer from a pool of candidate reasoning chains is the engine of test-time scaling, yet the standard selectors each carry a cost: self-consistency inherits the errors of the single model it resamples, and trained reward models need labeled data and transfer poorly off-distribution.

By Ning Liu