arXiv:2607. 22662v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-web corpora curated via highly selective filters, such as FineWeb-Edu and DCLM, constitute the core of LLM pretraining data and have significantly advanced LLM performance.
By Peiguang Li, Yongwei Zhou, Juncheng Diao, Yuchun Fan, Jian Yang, Jianxiao Yang, Zhongda Su, Shuguang Jiao, Xiao Wei, Zhiye Zou, Gan Dong, Zhizhao Zeng, Rongxiang Weng, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai
arXiv:2607.00890v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development. We introduce MultiSynt/MT, an open synth...
By Maximilian Idahl, J\"org Tiedemann, Sampo Pyysalo, David Salinas, Tomasz Galica, Shenbin Qian, Tudor Nicolae Mateiu, Zihao Li, Anna Lokrantz, Fedor Vitiugin, Andr\'e F. T. Martins, Jenna Kanerva, Filip Ginter, Matthias Lindemann, Tim Isbister, Birger Moell, Jonas Lindh, Jan Haji\v{c}, Jenia Jitsev, Andrey Kutuzov, Stephan Oepen, Gema Ram\'irez-S\'anchez
Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development. We introduce MultiSynt/MT, an open synthetic parallel corpus with approximately 4.
Large-scale pretraining corpora contain substantial duplicate content. Although document-level deduplication is widely used, removing subdocument-level redundancy remains challenging.
The paper introduces the problem of cross‑lingual loopholes in large language model (LLM) unlearning, where forgetting a fact in one language can leave it accessible in others. It presents a new 174‑language benchmark, the Cross‑Lingual Unlearning Tensor, and proposes COVER, a method that selects a subset of source languages to maximize unlearning coverage under a language budget. Experiments show COVER reduces residual knowledge by 7.8–27.3% compared to uniform selection and works on both synthetic and real low‑resource news data.
By Tyler Skow, Shravan Chaudhari, Rama Chellappa, Abhay Yadav
TransClean introduces a benchmark for identifying and removing translation noise—unwanted text such as language labels, explanations, or bilingual repetitions—from large language model (LLM) outputs. The authors analyzed 790,000 translations from 12 LLMs across 22 language pairs, cataloguing 12 common noise patterns and creating 9,900 noisy‑clean pairs (8,800 synthetic, 1,100 authentic). They evaluated two extraction methods—a span‑based approach using quality estimation models and an LLM‑prompted method—demonstrating the first systematic framework to assess and improve translation cleanliness.
By Shenbin Qian, Yves Scherrer
arXiv:2606. 02991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce TypewriterLM, a 7.
By Xiaoxi Luo, Zachary Shinnick, Niclas Griesshaber, Yixuan Wang, Junchi Yu, Freda Shi, Philip Torr, Yao Lu
arXiv:2609.25298v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Cultural evaluation coverage and robustness in language models are difficult to diagnose because pretraining corpora and cultural benchmarks are rarely...
By Yusser Al Ghussin, Eva Gavaller, Cristina Espa\~na-Bonet, Josef van Genabith, Simon Ostermann
The paper introduces a three‑stage training pipeline that builds compact, efficient dense retrievers without requiring ground‑truth relevance labels. Using cross‑lingual alignment, relational knowledge distillation, and contrastive fine‑tuning, the authors develop PolDense (six Polish models ranging from 17 M to 1 B parameters) and EuroDense (a 435 M‑parameter model covering nine European languages). Extensive evaluation on 41 Polish and 150 multilingual tasks shows that PolDense‑1B outperforms larger retrievers up to 9 B parameters, while EuroDense leads in task‑averaged and language‑averaged performance among models below 1 B parameters.
By S{\l}awomir Dadas, Rafa{\l} Po\'swiata, Ma{\l}gorzata Gr\k{e}bowiec, Micha{\l} Pere{\l}kiewicz
TACTICS is a method for selecting evaluation samples in machine translation that explicitly optimizes for coverage of rare linguistic categories, document-level coherence, and distributional fidelity to the full corpus. It builds a hierarchical taxonomy from a locale style guide, classifies segments, and chooses a fixed-budget subset that better represents the full range of phenomena a system must handle. Compared to random, lexical, or embedding-based selection, TACTICS improves coverage of rare categories and yields more accurate system rankings with fewer segments.
By Prasanth Bathala, Anubhav Shrimal, Sukhdeep Singh Kharbhanda, Pradyumna Lanka, Rohit Dhaipule
arXiv:2609.07798v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) in the climate domain requires models to process heterogeneous text sources, including scientific literature, polic...
By Yongan Yu, Shantam Raj, Jingwei Ni, Ario Saeid Vaghefi, Dominik Stammbach, Markus Leippold
arXiv:2609.00082v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLMs acquire vast amounts of knowledge during pre-training, but often lack the specialized knowledge needed to answer questions from niche sources su...
By Meghanadh Pulivarthi, Kushagra Bhushan, Vineet Kumar, Gaurav Pandey, Jaydeep Sen, Dinesh Raghu, Sachindra Joshi, Yatin Nandwani