arXiv:2608.12018v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Neural Machine Translation (NMT) and Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at cross-lingual tasks but often fail to capture intra-lingual morphologica...
By Rakib Ullah, Md. Ruhul Islam, Tanbir Ahmed, Nayan Kumar Nath
arXiv:2601. 22888v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: More than 80% of the 1.
By Jio Oh, Paul Vicinanza, Thomas Butler, Steven Euijong Whang, Dezhi Hong, Amani Namboori
arXiv:2602.14488v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: IR in low-resource languages remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality, task-specific annotated datasets. Manual annotation is expensiv...
By Md. Najib Hasan, Mst. Jannatun Ferdous Rain, Fyad Mohammed, Nazmul Siddique
arXiv:2608.30065v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong Helpfulness, Harmlessness, and Honesty (3H) alignment in English-centric settings, but these gains tr...
By Abdullah Hashmat, Usman Naseem, Agha Ali Raza
VakyArth is the first pragmatic benchmark for Indic languages, covering Hindi, Punjabi, Tamil, and Malayalam. It tests models on five pragmatic phenomena—deixis, speech acts, implicature, social pragmatics, and coherence—using multiple-choice questions, natural language inference, and translation tasks authored by native speakers. Evaluation of multilingual LLMs shows consistent failures on pragmatic meanings rooted in Indic linguistic and cultural conventions, with systematic differences across languages and tasks.
By Usneek Singh, Poorvaja Veera Balaji Kumar, Parth Nanda, Anand Madhusoodanan, Geyang Guo, Wei Xu, Junyi Jessy L
arXiv:2011.03783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: In this work, we introduce the construction of a machine translation (MT) assisted and human-in-the-loop multilingual parallel corpus with an...
By Lifeng Han, Najet Hadj Mohamed, Malak Rassem, Gareth Jones, Alan Smeaton, Goran Nenadic
The paper compares generative and encoder-based neural models for multilingual Named Entity Recognition (NER) across the eleven languages of the Naamapadam benchmark. Five classic model families, four decoder-only large language models fine‑tuned with LoRA and 4‑bit NF4 quantisation, and nine generative models in zero‑to‑5‑shot inference were evaluated under strict CoNLL span‑level metrics. Encoder-based models (mBERT and XLM‑R) achieved substantially higher F1 scores—up to 0.675 on Hindi—than any generative architecture, with gaps of 7.5–40 percentage points; the best few‑shot result reached only 28% of the encoder baseline. The study identifies three language clusters (encoder‑dominant, partial‑coverage, and failure‑zone) and offers deployment guidelines based on transfer learning and low‑resource NLP principles.
By Jakkala Mahesh, Jatavath Shravan Kumar, Komalla Shivani, Sujoy Sarkar
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong Helpfulness, Harmlessness, and Honesty (3H) alignment in English-centric settings, but these gains transfer poorly to low-resource languages due to cult...
arXiv:2607.22376v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Most endangered languages lack the parallel data required for machine translation, despite the existence of descriptive grammar books. We introduce...
By Varun Ghat Ravikumar, Sina Ahmadi, Lena J\"ager, Rico Sennrich
arXiv:2607. 23319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard subword tokenization algorithms such as Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and SentencePiece are trained predominantly on modern language corpora and produce inefficient segmentations when applied to classical Indian languages.
By Poornima Kumaresan, Pavithra Muruganantham, Lakshmi Rajendran, Santhosh Sivasubramani
The paper presents an end‑to‑end sequence‑to‑sequence approach for correcting Tamil spelling and grammar errors, leveraging progressively fine‑tuned transformer models (mT5‑small and mBART‑50). Using a synthetic corpus of 657,720 noisy‑clean sentence pairs across ten error categories, the authors introduce a four‑stage training schedule that targets surface noise, contextual grammar, single‑site sandhi, and multi‑site cross‑word sandhi. The best model, mBART‑50 v5, achieves 69.3% exact‑match accuracy on a balanced diagnostic set, with notable gains in sandhi (87.5%) and subject‑verb agreement (43.5%) accuracy, while also revealing a precision‑recall trade‑off for sandhi corrections.
By Karthikeyan A, Jaya Nirmala S, Sangeetha Sivanesan, Indhu R, Pranav Kumar, Bharat Jude Johnson, Vishnu Ram
The paper introduces IndicReStruct, a benchmark dataset comprising two variants—GSM8K-Reordered and GSM8K-Voice—derived from GSM8K to test multilingual LLMs on Hindi and Malayalam. It evaluates six state‑of‑the‑art LLMs under constrained constituent reordering and active‑passive voice transformation, finding consistent and significant drops in mathematical reasoning performance. Qualitative error analysis and residual‑stream activation patching reveal that failures often stem from disrupted entity‑quantity alignment, with intermediate transformer layers playing a key role in restoring reasoning.
By Karthika Nhayakkat, Rajat Verma, Maharaj Brahma, Vetcha Gnana Mahesh, Maunendra Sankar Desarkar, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Rohit Saluja