arXiv AI

Exit-and-Join Dynamics for Decentralized Coalition Formation

arXiv:2606. 19683v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies coalition formation as a decentralized dynamical process driven by unilateral exit-and-join decisions.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Stable and Budget-Feasible Coalition Formation for Clustered Federated Learning: A Hedonic Potential-Game Approach

arXiv:2607. 26788v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clustered federated learning benefits from organizing heterogeneous participants into coalitions that train coalition-specific models, but such clustering is sustainable only if participants prefer their assigned coalition and the required transfers are affordable.

By Cengis Hasan
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Evolutionary Stability Does Not Guarantee Learning Accessibility: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Perspective on Cooperation Emergence

The paper investigates whether evolutionary stability guarantees that learning agents can achieve cooperative outcomes in a multi‑agent setting. Using a three‑agent governance game, the authors compare the evolutionary basin of attraction with learning basins derived from independent Q‑learning, scaled Boltzmann exploration, and SA–EA BQL. They find that while the evolutionary basin covers the entire sampled grid, only ε‑greedy Q‑learning attains a substantial learning basin, whereas the other methods fail to sustain cooperation, highlighting a disconnect between population‑level stability and finite‑sample learning accessibility.

By Yijie Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

A Decentralized Partially Observable Team Decision Methodology with Delayed Information Sharing

The paper introduces a decentralized decision-making framework for teams operating under partial observability and unknown system dynamics. By leveraging low-rank latent dynamics and delayed shared information, each team member learns an approximate Markov decision process using only local private data and delayed common updates. The resulting algorithm achieves near‑optimal team performance without requiring a centralized coordinator or training, and the authors provide finite‑sample guarantees and a sample‑complexity bound.

By Xiaoxing Ren, Thomas Parisini, Andreas A. Malikopoulos
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 17

What preferences can - and cannot - predict in multi-agent online learning

arXiv:2608. 13810v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We examine the interplay between ordinal, preference-based solution concepts in games and the long-run behavior of game dynamics, asking in particular to what extent the combinatorial data of a game -- its preference graph -- determine the outcomes of no-regret learning dynamics -- such as follow-the-regularized-leader (FTRL).

By Omar Abbadi, Rida Laraki, Panayotis Mertikopoulos
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Decentralized Optimal Equilibrium Learning Over Dynamic Networks

The paper introduces a decentralized learning framework for finding socially optimal equilibria in finite normal-form games played over dynamic communication networks. Agents only observe their own payoffs, lack prior knowledge of the game, and communicate with time-varying neighbors using low-bandwidth, time-stamped tables instead of raw actions or payoff data. The proposed dynamics combine randomized semantic signals, table fusion, and temporal majority reconstruction to achieve finite-time logarithmic regret guarantees for optimal equilibrium selection under utilitarian and proportional-fair social welfare objectives, as demonstrated by simulations.

By Seref Taha Kiremitci, Muhammed O. Sayin