arXiv Machine Learning

Performance uncertainty in medical image analysis: a large-scale investigation of confidence intervals

The study investigates how confidence intervals (CIs) behave in medical imaging AI by analyzing 24 segmentation and classification tasks with 19 models per task, various metrics, aggregation strategies, and CI methods. It finds that required sample sizes for reliable CIs vary widely, CI behavior depends on performance metrics, aggregation strategy, and problem type, and that different CI methods differ in reliability and precision. The authors provide a decision tree to guide researchers in selecting appropriate CI methods, aiming to support future consensus guidelines on reporting performance uncertainty.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

A Decision-Aware Evaluation Protocol for Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation

The paper introduces a decision‑aware evaluation protocol for medical image segmentation uncertainty that separates uncertainty estimation from deferral policy and assesses their joint performance under fixed review budgets. It reports metrics such as fixed‑budget error reduction, risk‑coverage behavior, region‑level review proxies, structural failure modes, and sensitivity to review assumptions. Experiments on retinal vessel, skin lesion, and polyp segmentation with various backbones and uncertainty estimators show that estimator rankings vary with review unit, uncertainty target, and cost model, and that boundary and thin‑structure failures are partly due to annotation ambiguity.

By Saket Maganti, Shreyank N Gowda
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Reliability analysis for BraTS-GoAT segmentation: a controlled robustness study of deep-ensemble uncertainty

The study evaluates the reliability of deep‑ensemble uncertainty for brain tumour segmentation on the BraTS‑GoAT dataset. A 5‑fold cross‑validated nnU‑Net baseline and a 3‑seed deep ensemble were compared for calibration and error detection; the ensemble showed modest gains in calibration on in‑distribution data but the single model’s confidence remained flat while accuracy degraded under synthetic corruptions. Disagreement among ensemble members rose sharply with corruption severity, proving to be a more sensitive indicator of acquisition shift than single‑model confidence.

By Riya Deepak Shet, Chenxi Liang, Le Zhang
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

Segmentation Confidence for Arbitrary CNNs

The paper presents a method for estimating segmentation confidence in convolutional neural networks without requiring custom architectures or retraining. It introduces voxel‑based uncertainty estimation that can be integrated into existing pipelines and proposes a novel technique to derive a single confidence score from uncertainty maps. Experiments across various regions of interest and imaging modalities demonstrate that the proposed score predicts segmentation performance on unseen data.

By Baris Oguz, Xing Yao, Claudia Tawil, Alison Pouch, Brett Byram, Gabriel Arenas, Nadav Schwartz, Ipek Oguz
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 17

Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction

The paper introduces an uncertainty‑mapping framework for periventricular Fazekas score prediction, moving beyond standard performance metrics. By linking uncertainty to positions in the learned feature space, it identifies class‑boundary regions where predictions are ambiguous and highlights potential label disagreements. The study shows that different loss functions affect the uncertainty profile, with some models achieving clearer class separation and more localized uncertainty.

By Susanne Schmid, Johanna Ospel, Richard Frayne, Roberto Souza
arXiv AI
Sep 16

A Vision-Language Foundation Model for Precise and Comprehensive Brain Tumor Diagnosis from Preoperative Multimodal Data

arXiv:2609.16597v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background Non-invasive presurgical diagnosis of brain tumor types from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is essential but challenging due to overlapp...

By Yinong Wang (Joyce), Jianwen Chen (Joyce), Zhou Chen (Joyce), Shuwen Kuang (Joyce), Haoning Jiang (Joyce), Yanzhao Shi (Joyce), Huichun Yuan (Joyce), Yan-ran (Joyce), Wang, Bing Wang, Lei Wu, Bin Tang, Li Meng, Baihua Luo, Bin Zhou, Wei Ding, Weiming Zhong, Wei Hou, Yuanbing Chen, Zhiping Wan, Wei Wang, Zhenkun Xiao, Wenwu Wan, Allen He, Yuyin Zhou, Longbo Zhang, Feifei Wang, Zhixiong Liu, Michael Iv, Xuan Gong, Liangqiong Qu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Rethinking Clinical Relevance in Chest X-ray Machine Learning: How Evaluation References Define Performance

arXiv:2607. 26333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment.

By Panagiotis Fytas, Ian Selby, Clemens Karner, Judith Babar, Simon Baker, Jake Beckford, Timothy J. Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, John Li Chen, Alex Sawer, Michael Roberts, Jonathan Weir-McCall, J. H. F. Rudd, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Anna Korhonen, Anna Breger