Hugging Face Trending Papers

Long-Term Simulation Exposes Cognitive-Developmental Risks in AI Companions

AI companions powered by large language models increasingly interact with cognition-developing users, including children and adolescents, creating risks that may accumulate over time. Existing safety evaluations largely rely on single-turn or short-session tests, which cannot capture risks that emerge only through prolonged interaction.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models

The paper introduces KIDBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs) for children aged 7-11. It includes realistic child queries across ten categories, single- and multi-turn prompts, and compares different prompting strategies—no cues, implicit cues, and explicit age instructions—showing that cueing improves safety scores. The study also reveals uneven safety performance across languages and cultures, and presents KIDGuardLlama, a child-safety evaluator, and KIDLlama, a child-safe response model.

By Samee Arif, Angana Borah, Rada Mihalcea
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 29

CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Models

How can we evaluate whether frontier AI systems recognize child-safety risks before they escalate into explicit harm? Existing child safety evaluations focus on child sexual abuse material, yet many child-safety failures begin earlier: in model assistance that helps adults manipulate, impersonate, profile, or isolate minors, and in model responses that deepen children's emotional dependence on AI systems rather than redirecting them toward human support.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

A Three-Tier Persona Vector for Controllable User Simulation in Agentic Evaluation

The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector to generate diverse, realistic user inputs for evaluating tool-augmented LLM agents. The vector includes 23 dimensions: categorical demographics, continuous behavioral traits, and continuous emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. Experiments on 64,698 conversations show that these persona dimensions produce measurable differences in agent performance and realistic scenario-reactive behavior.

arXiv AI
Aug 10

Do AI Personas Grow? Analyzing and Benchmarking Personality Evolution in LLM Agents After Life Events

arXiv:2608. 06485v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personality-conditioned LLM agents (PC-Agents) are increasingly used in emotional support, social simulation, and role-playing, motivating the development of lifelong agents that remain coherent over extended interactions.

By Ming Wang, Peidong Wang, Xiaocui Yang, Daling Wang, Shi Feng, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Ee-Peng Lim
arXiv AI
Sep 10

A Three-Tier Persona Vector for Controllable User Simulation in Agentic Evaluation

The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector for user simulation in evaluating LLM agents, comprising 23 dimensions across demographics, behavioral traits, and emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. It demonstrates that these nuanced personas generate diverse, scenario-reactive conversations, leading to significant variations in agent goal achievement and compliance across different contexts. The model’s design allows for reproducible, auditable user behavior patterns without relying on learned covariance matrices.

By Rahul Khedar, Eshita, Sneha Teja Sree Reddy Thondapu, Mayank Malhotra, Arup Kumar Das, Jitesh Chandra Mishra, Arun Menon, Avinash Karn, Mouli V
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

SIC-Agents: Benchmarking and Building an Adaptive Simulator for Pediatric Serious Illness Communication Training

The paper introduces SIC-Agents, a self‑improving framework designed to enhance simulation for pediatric serious illness communication (SIC) training. It presents two new benchmark suites—PitfallBench and DialogueBench—that assess simulators at both turn‑level and full‑dialogue levels, specifically addressing the unique challenges of multi‑party interactions and parental distress. Experiments demonstrate that SIC‑Agents surpasses static expert prompting, and the authors release the benchmarks for broader research use.

By Zihan Wang, Anita Marie Slominska, Rennie Bimman, Elizabeth Di Flumeri, Amanda Mayappo-Neeposh, Conall Francoeur, Tamara Ellen Carver, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup, Esin Darici Haritaoglu, Ismail Haritaoglu, Akshatha Arodi, Naomi Goloff