arXiv Machine Learning By Kaavya Krishna-Kumar, Elaine Lau, Vaughn Robinson, Jay Caldwell, Sheriff Issaka, Skyler Wang, Francisco Guzm\'an, Steven Kelling, Jonas Mueller

CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 29685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How can we evaluate whether frontier AI systems recognize child-safety risks before they escalate into explicit harm?

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 29

CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Models

How can we evaluate whether frontier AI systems recognize child-safety risks before they escalate into explicit harm? Existing child safety evaluations focus on child sexual abuse material, yet many child-safety failures begin earlier: in model assistance that helps adults manipulate, impersonate, profile, or isolate minors, and in model responses that deepen children's emotional dependence on AI systems rather than redirecting them toward human support.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models

The paper introduces KIDBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs) for children aged 7-11. It includes realistic child queries across ten categories, single- and multi-turn prompts, and compares different prompting strategies—no cues, implicit cues, and explicit age instructions—showing that cueing improves safety scores. The study also reveals uneven safety performance across languages and cultures, and presents KIDGuardLlama, a child-safety evaluator, and KIDLlama, a child-safe response model.

By Samee Arif, Angana Borah, Rada Mihalcea
arXiv AI
Jun 9

When Behavioral Safety Evaluation Fails: A Representation-Level Perspective

arXiv:2606. 08044v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) safety has often been evaluated at the behavior level, which provides limited evidence of internal robustness, as these evaluations target outputs rather than representation-level vulnerability under intervention.

By Enyi Jiang, Anders Gj{\o}lbye, Yibo Jacky Zhang, Sanmi Koyejo