arXiv Machine Learning

Extending ROC Analysis to Uncertainty-Aware Risk Prediction with an Interval-Based AUC (iAUC)

arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Fragility-aware Classification for Risk Characterization and Robust Learning

The paper introduces the Fragility Index (FI), a new performance metric that measures the tail risk of confident misclassifications in classification models. FI is framed within a robust satisficing framework to assess classifier sensitivity under distributional uncertainty, and the authors develop a surrogate-based training method with provable bounds linking training fragility to ranking-error FI. The approach is extended to common loss functions and includes an FI-based regularizer for deep neural networks, with empirical studies on medical diagnosis tasks showing that FI reveals risk not captured by accuracy or AUC and leads to models with lower operational costs in a human–AI diagnostic workflow.

By Zheng Cui, Daniel Zhuoyu Long, Jin Qi, Chen Yang, Ruohan Zhan
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Uncertainty-Aware Learning from Multi-Expert Interval Targets

The paper introduces a method for learning from multiple experts who provide interval labels, addressing both within‑label imprecision and between‑expert variation. It harmonizes diverse label vocabularies into a shared probabilistic space, retains individual intervals using a mixture of Beta distributions, and decomposes predictive uncertainty into components that are matched to their corresponding sources of label uncertainty. On sea‑ice concentration data, the approach achieves a 31% reduction in mean absolute error compared to hard‑label baselines and outperforms several aggregation and interval‑regression methods.

By Samira Alkaee Taleghan, Younghyun Koo, Andrew P. Barrett, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

Uncertainty of Vision Medical Foundation Models

The paper investigates how pre‑training strategy, dataset size, and domain affect uncertainty estimation in vision medical foundation models. It compares point‑prediction calibration with conformal (region) prediction across retinal, histopathological, and chest X‑ray models, finding that domain‑specific, self‑supervised pre‑training yields better calibration and more efficient conformal sets. The study shows that standard recalibration alone cannot fully reconcile uncertainty differences between models trained on different data sources.

By Haoxu Huang, Narges Razavian
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Conformalized Super Learner

arXiv:2604.22391v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Super Learner (SL) is a widely used ensemble method that combines point predictions from a library of learners based on their predictive...

By Zhanli Wu, Fabrizio Leisen, Miguel-Angel Luque-Fernandez, F. Javier Rubio
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Local Discrimination of Binary Classifiers via Localized AUC Functional

The paper introduces a new metric called Localized AUC (LAUC), a weighted version of the traditional AUC, to detect performance heterogeneity in risk prediction models. Using LAUC, the authors develop a method named LOCATOR that identifies patient cohorts where the model’s predictions are inaccurate. They validate LOCATOR on both real-world data and simulations and provide a statistical foundation for applying LAUC in this context.

By Wenye Ren, Anna Gy\H{o}rffy-Kerekes, Tancredi Dorsi, Olga Demler
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

Isotonic Conformal Prediction

arXiv:2607. 16675v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A point prediction that is well calibrated on average can still be systematically biased conditional on its own value, undermining its use in downstream decision-making.

By Daniel Bensimon, Sean Xiang Yu, Eric D. Kolaczyk, Archer Y. Yang