The paper introduces the reflexivity matrix Ω to capture how one agent’s deployment influences another’s best response in multi‑agent performative prediction. It identifies a spectral threshold—when the spectral radius of Ω exceeds one—separating stable learning from worst‑case learning obstruction. Below this threshold, repeated retraining converges geometrically to a unique stable equilibrium with bounded excess loss; above it, cumulative excess loss can grow linearly with the horizon.
arXiv:2607. 17914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robust multi-agent coordination relies heavily on inter-agent communication, which is frequently disrupted by physical and environmental constraints in real-world deployments.
The paper introduces CASTLE, a framework for fully decentralized multi‑agent reinforcement learning that uses two offline‑trained world models to provide in‑context guidance to independent agents. A Local Dynamics World Model captures each agent’s trajectory dynamics, while a Semantic‑Social World Model predicts short‑horizon task and social outcomes for candidate actions based on counterfactual simulator rollouts. During online learning, these frozen models supply prediction logits to an independent PPO policy, enabling agents to compare potential actions prospectively rather than relying solely on scalar rewards. CASTLE outperforms existing baselines on several multi‑particle benchmark tasks, achieving the highest mean final scores across 30 seeds.
Prospective Hindsight (PH) is a self‑calibrating training principle for reinforcement learning that augments any retrospective base method with a signal derived from the gap between an agent’s prospective prediction and its retrospective evaluation. By weighting gradients with a stop‑gradient surprise based on this prediction‑reality gap, PH highlights samples where the agent’s self‑model is most inaccurate and encourages the policy and predictor to co‑evolve, progressively focusing on remaining blind spots. Experiments on single‑turn verifiable tasks and a multi‑turn personal‑agent task show that PH improves both task performance and calibration across model scales, addressing overconfident failures in single‑turn settings and underconfident successes in multi‑turn settings.
arXiv:2607. 04470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a natural interface for translating human objectives into reward signals for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), yet the training-time dynamics of this integration remain poorly understood.
arXiv:2609.14065v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When algorithmic predictions inform people's decisions, the models we deploy are performative and actively shape the data we see. This feedback loop be...
arXiv:2605. 24202v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent LLM workflows route inference through specialized roles to lift end-task accuracy, but jointly training those roles with reinforcement learning is unstable in ways that are poorly understood.
arXiv:2607. 05609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Continual Learning (CL) literature has long been driven by the goal of mitigating catastrophic forgetting.
arXiv:2609. 22833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study personalized federated reinforcement learning, in which $n$ agents, each acting in its own Markov decision process, collaborate through a server to learn a shared MAML-style policy initialization that becomes effective for an individual agent once that agent adapts it with a single local policy-gradient step.
The paper introduces Feedback‑Enriched Environments (FEEs) as a new approach to training large language models as autonomous agents for long‑horizon tasks. By shifting from action guidance to observation enrichment during later stages of exploration, FEEs improve performance across SciWorld and BFCL benchmarks with various Qwen3 model scales and RL algorithms. The study shows that FEEs stabilize training, promote proactive exploration, embed environmental guidance into policy weights, and highlight intra‑group feedback consistency as key for stable optimization.
The paper studies a stationary decentralized Markov game where a focal agent experiences drifting rewards and dynamics due to learning peers, framing this as an agent‑centric continual reinforcement‑learning problem. It introduces the concept of an invariant core—maximal abstract patterns common to many successful trajectories—and proves a worst‑case conditioning theorem linking trajectory‑law drift to success coverage. The authors provide theoretical guarantees for survival horizon, first‑exit law, and regret, and validate their predictions with solvable models and empirical studies in continual control, cue‑MNIST, and Level‑Based Foraging.
arXiv:2510.15047v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents often fail to improve in new environments. We identify and characterize a failure mode we call explora...
arXiv:2607. 15623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predictive models deployed at scale influence future data, a phenomenon called performativity.