arXiv:2510.15047v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents often fail to improve in new environments. We identify and characterize a failure mode we call explora...
By Shiqi Chen, Tongyao Zhu, Zian Wang, Jinghan Zhang, Kangrui Wang, Ruochen Zhou, Siyang Gao, Teng Xiao, Yee Whye Teh, Junxian He, Manling Li
AEM: Adaptive Entropy Modulation for Multi‑Turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning proposes a supervision‑free credit assignment technique that adjusts entropy dynamics at the response level during RL training. By aligning uncertainty estimation with the granularity of LLM agent actions and rescaling advantages based on a response‑level uncertainty proxy, AEM improves the exploration‑exploitation balance without relying on dense intermediate supervision. Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and SWE‑bench‑Verified show consistent performance gains across models from 1.5B to 32B, including a 1.4% improvement in a state‑of‑the‑art software‑engineering RL framework.
By Haotian Zhao, Songlin Zhou, Yuxin Zhang, Stephen S. -T. Yau, Wenyu Zhang, Lun Tian, Tianshu Zhu, Yifeng Huang, Yucheng Zeng, Jingnan Gu, Daxiang Dong, Jianmin Wu
arXiv:2608. 02139v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) capable of self-improvement require not only effective policy optimization, but also a principled mechanism for transforming transient interaction experience into persistent model capabilities.
By Shijie Ren, Xiting Wang, Meng Li, Yujie Guo, Yunhang Yao, Ziheng Peng, Xunlong Wang, Yuetan Chen, Haoyang Zhou, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng
arXiv:2606. 17680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents.
By Zhitong Wang, Songze Li, Hao Peng, Shuzheng Si, Yi Wang, Maosong Sun, Juanzi Li
arXiv:2608.05446v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents increasingly rely on external execution support to maintain state, track progress, recover from failures, and reuse experie...
By Xuying Ning, Dongqi Fu, Tianxin Wei, Yuanchen Bei, Xiyuan Yang, Wujiang Xu, Yueqi Song, Bingxuan Li, Zihao Li, Hanqing Zeng, Xiang Shen, Yajuan Wang, Yifan Wu, Qifan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Hong Li, Yinglong Xia, Xiangjun Fan, Hanghang Tong, Jingrui He
Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization (RGPO) is a reinforcement‑learning framework that adaptively uses ground‑truth rationale information to scaffold a language model’s reasoning process. Instead of treating reference solutions as fixed imitation targets, RGPO temporarily incorporates rationales to help the model generate better responses, then reverts to unguided learning with higher‑reward, model‑generated solutions. Experiments in both language‑only and vision‑language tasks show that RGPO consistently outperforms RLVR baselines, with ablation studies confirming that adaptive rationale guidance is a key factor in its success.
By Hoang Phan, Minh Pham, Chau Pham, Chinmay Hegde, Trung Le, Qi Lei