arXiv AI

PolyChirp: Multi-Species Birdsong Classification Using TinyML on Low-Power Acoustic Sensors

arXiv AI
Aug 24

Investigating Target Class Influence on Neural Network Compressibility for Energy-Autonomous Avian Monitoring

The paper explores how the number of bird species (target classes) affects the compressibility of neural networks for passive acoustic monitoring on microcontroller units (MCUs). By training and compressing models with varying class counts, the authors show that significant compression can be achieved with minimal performance loss. They also benchmark different hardware platforms and assess the feasibility of deploying energy‑autonomous monitoring devices.

By Nina Brolich, Simon Geis, Maximilian Kasper, Alexander Barnhill, Axel Plinge, Dominik Seu{\ss}
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Project SPARROW and the Future of Conservation Technology

arXiv:2606. 00108v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Global biodiversity is declining at unprecedented rates, yet the tools available to monitor and protect ecosystems remain limited by constraints in power, connectivity, and accessibility.

By Juan M. Lavista Ferres, Carl Chalmers, Bruno Demuro Segundo, Zhongqi Miao, Andres Hernandez Celis, Federico Alves Torres, Isai Daniel Chacon Silva, Anthony Cintron Roman, Allen Kim, Meygha Machado, Luana Marotti, Amy Michaels, Daniela Ruiz Lopez, Catherine Romero, Rahul Dodhia, Inbal Becker-Reshef, Pablo Arbelaez
arXiv AI
Jun 16

An affordable hardware-aware neural architecture search for deploying convolutional neural networks on ultra-low-power computing platforms

arXiv:2606. 16290v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hardware-aware neural architecture search (HW-NAS) allows the integration of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in microcontrollers devices by automatically designing neural architectures that can fit prearranged hardware constraints.

By Andrea Mattia Garavagno, Edoardo Ragusa, Antonio Frisoli, Paolo Gastaldo
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Efficient Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Killer Whales Using a Two-Stage Detection and Ecotype Classification Cascade

The paper presents a lightweight ResNet-based two-stage cascade for passive acoustic monitoring of killer whales. First, it detects vocalizations, then it classifies confident detections into five eastern North Pacific ecotypes, abstaining on ambiguous calls. The pipeline achieves high macro‑F1 scores on the DCLDE 2027 dataset and improves real‑time inference speed, while active learning adapts the detector to new acoustic environments.

By Daniela Ruiz, Manuel Castellote, Zhongqi Miao, Carl Chalmers, Bruno Demuro, Rahul Dodhia, Pablo Arbelaez, Juan M. Lavista
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Low-Power, Neuromorphic, Acoustic Anomaly Detection for Persistent Machine Monitoring

The paper presents an autoencoder-based acoustic anomaly detection system implemented on Intel’s Loihi 2 neuromorphic processor. It achieves high detection performance—0.9959 AUC on a clean ToyADMOS ToyCar benchmark and 0.7990 source AUC on a noisy DCASE 2026 Task 2 ToyCar benchmark—while operating with only 0.0406–0.0426 mJ of dynamic energy per sample, far below CPU and GPU baselines. The system demonstrates that low‑power, on‑chip inference is feasible for persistent machine monitoring.

By Steven C. Nesbit (Information Sciences, CAI-3, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA), Victor M. Vergara (AeroVironment Inc., Albuquerque, USA), Michael A. Felix (University of New Mexico COSMIAC Research Center, Albuquerque, USA), Evan T. Kain (Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, USA), Luis R. Garc\'ia Carrillo (Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, USA), Gerd J. Kunde (Nuclear and Particle Physics and Applications, P-3, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA), Andrew T. Sornborger (Information Sciences, CAI-3, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA)
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Does YOLO26 Truly Offer Advantages Over Its Predecessors for Edge Deployment? A Benchmark Study in Aquaculture

The paper evaluates the new YOLO26 architecture, which offers NMS-free end-to-end inference and is tailored for CPU-based edge devices, against three earlier Ultralytics models (YOLOv5u, YOLOv8, and YOLO11) in aquaculture fish mortality detection. Across nano, small, and medium scales, all models achieved similar detection accuracy on a full dataset, but differences emerged in data efficiency and deployment performance: YOLOv8 reached 90% mAP50 with only 400 images, while YOLO26 variants needed 1,000 images; YOLO26n was fastest on a Raspberry Pi 5 (7.51 FPS), whereas YOLOv5mu led on CPU-based hardware. The study concludes that architectural novelty alone does not dictate suitability for edge AI in aquaculture; training data size, target hardware, and inference needs must be jointly considered.

By Rakesh Ranjan, Gajanan S. Kothawade, Kata Sharrer, Scott Tsukuda, Christopher Good