Reinforcement learning

Policy optimisation, reward modelling and RLHF — how models are trained by feedback rather than by labels.

6,934 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Drift-Constrained Optimization: Only Direction Matters in Fine-Tuning Instruct Models

The paper introduces Drift-Constrained Optimization (DCO), a framework that treats behavioral drift during fine‑tuning of instruction models as a bounded constraint rather than an uncontrolled side effect. By defining a drift budget, the authors reformulate fine‑tuning as a direction‑selection problem, showing that choosing different update directions can qualitatively change outcomes. Experiments on Qwen3 models demonstrate that carefully selected directions improve scientific reasoning and multilingual translation while preserving reasoning capabilities and general performance.

By Fei Yuan, Changjiang Gao, Yilei Tu, Yifeng Liu, Shujian Huang, Yu Qiao
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Salesforce Koa: An Enterprise Language Model for Agentic Tool Use

arXiv:2609.15066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Salesforce Koa, an enterprise language model built by post-training the open-weight Nemotron-3-Super-120B foundation model with reinforcem...

By Zixiang Chen, Sufeng Niu, Yingchi Liu, Wenting Zhao, Akshara Prabhakar, Shubham Mehrotra, Bin Bi, Zhujun Lan, Katherine Tan, Mohammad Ramezanali, Tulika Manoj Awalgaonkar, Monojit Banerjee, Jielin Qiu, Shiva Kumar Pentyala, Zhepeng Cen, Anupam Tripathi, Ali Ziaei, Regunathan Radhakrishnan, Darvish Lee Shadravan, Shelby Heinecke, Sitaram Asur, Silvio Savarese, James Zhu, Phil Mui, Huan Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Adaptive Chemotherapy Control under Tumor Heterogeneity via Reinforcement Learning

The paper presents a study on adaptive chemotherapy control using deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to address tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance. Closed‑loop DRL dosing policies—continuous (TD3) and discrete (DQN)—are trained on a high‑dimensional heterogeneous tumor model and benchmarked against a Pontryagin's Maximum Principle (PMP) open‑loop solution. Across a 100‑patient virtual cohort with ±10% parameter perturbations, TD3 achieves higher average tumor reduction, while DQN offers tighter inter‑patient dosing consistency, highlighting an efficacy‑consistency trade‑off. The work assumes full observation of tumor subpopulations, noting that clinical translation will require handling sparse, noisy measurements.

By Bereket Sitotaw Kidane, Md Samiul Haque Motayed, Shuo Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Granularity-Adaptive Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces GACA, a critic‑free reinforcement learning estimator that adapts credit assignment granularity based on a step‑level uncertainty proxy. GACA assigns higher weight to fine‑grained signals for steps with above‑average negative log‑likelihood, while relying on episode‑level signals for less uncertain steps, improving task success on ALFWorld and WebShop for 1.5B and 7B language models. The authors provide a risk decomposition, a conditional bound on action‑value variation, and an error‑projection analysis to justify the method’s effectiveness.

By Taoran Liang, Yang Liu, Shang Luo, Yingguang Yang, Rongrong Zhang, Yingzong Min, Yulin Huang, Jianshen Zhang, Yongzhi Qi, Kefu Xu, Congjing Ran, Bin Chong
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Satisficing Regret Minimization in Bandits: Constant Rate and Light-Tailed Distribution

The paper introduces SELECT, an algorithmic framework for satisficing regret minimization in bandit problems, achieving constant expected satisficing regret when a satisficing arm exists. A variant, SELECT‑LITE, further ensures a light‑tailed satisficing regret distribution while maintaining constant expected regret in the realizable case and sub‑linear standard regret otherwise. Experiments on synthetic data and a real‑world dynamic pricing scenario demonstrate the practical effectiveness of both algorithms.

By Qing Feng, Tianyi Ma, Ruihao Zhu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Amortized Low-Rank Adaptation for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces CLAW, a method that uses a hypernetwork to generate low‑rank adapters for world models during test time, enabling efficient adaptation to new environments with only a few episodes of interaction. By jointly pretraining the hypernetwork and base model on simulated adaptations, CLAW balances computational efficiency and expressivity, outperforming both in‑context learning and gradient‑based adaptation in locomotion and manipulation tasks. The approach also mitigates overfitting in data‑scarce regimes and demonstrates that the benefit stems from expressive adapters rather than context conditioning.

By Fernando Palafox, David Fridovich-Keil
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Inverting Self-Triggered Control: Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Sparse Denial-of-Service Attacks

The paper introduces an adversarial reinforcement learning framework that learns the sparsest Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack schedule capable of destabilizing self‑triggered reinforcement learning controllers (RL‑STC). It proves a lower bound on the minimum number of jamming actions needed to force a crash and demonstrates that the learned adversary consistently defeats four different defenders—one LQR and three RL‑STC—across Pendulum, CartPole, and Quadrotor2D environments, outperforming greedy and periodic baselines in jam‑time‑per‑failure. The study also shows that the adversary remains effective under Gaussian observation noise and limited state information.

By Adam Haroon, Erick J. Rodr\'iguez-Seda, Tristan Schuler, Cody Fleming
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Offline Reinforcement Learning for Wind Farm Control: A Wind Tunnel Study under Dynamic Wind Directions

The paper introduces MTD3-BC, a model‑free offline reinforcement learning algorithm that optimizes yaw control for wind farms amid changing wind directions. By learning from a pre‑collected dataset and incorporating an action consistency term, it reduces the need for extensive simulator interactions. Experimental wind‑tunnel tests show that MTD3‑BC improves farm‑level power output by about 10% compared to a greedy baseline and matches a model‑based benchmark, all while cutting training costs dramatically.

By Yuhan Su, Hongyang Dong, Simone Tamaro, Filippo Campagnolo, Carlo L. Bottasso, Xiaowei Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

SaFeR-Steer: Evolving Multi-Turn MLLMs via Synthetic Bootstrapping and Feedback Dynamics

SaFeR-Steer is a progressive multi‑turn alignment framework that uses staged synthetic bootstrapping and tutor‑in‑the‑loop GRPO to train a single student model against adaptive, on‑policy attacks. It introduces Trajectory‑Consistent Summative Reward (TCSR) to ensure that low‑quality turns impact the overall trajectory reward. The authors release the STEER dataset and demonstrate that SaFeR‑Steer significantly improves safety and helpfulness on both single‑turn and multi‑turn benchmarks for Qwen2.5‑VL models.

By Haolong Hu, Hanyu Li, Tiancheng He, Huahui Yi, An Zhang, Qiankun Li, Kun Wang, Yang Liu, Zhigang Zeng
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Sampling via Decision-Flow: Training-Free Extraction of Improved Latent Reasoning Paths in Large Language Models

The paper introduces Decision-Flow Sampling (DF‑Sample), a training‑free, data‑free inference framework that builds a hierarchical reasoning tree, evaluates entire trajectories, and back‑propagates utilities to guide branching decisions. Unlike local step‑wise sampling, DF‑Sample explicitly assesses global paths, enabling it to recover high‑quality, low‑probability reasoning chains that standard decoding misses. On the GPQA benchmark, DF‑Sample attains 45.6% accuracy, outperforming power sampling (38.9%) and GRPO (39.9%) and consistently surpassing baselines across multiple models and benchmarks, demonstrating significant latent reasoning potential in pretrained LLMs.

By Zhendong Mi, Shaoyi Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Reinforcement Learning over Patient Trajectories for Clinical Reasoning in EHR Foundation Models

The paper proposes a reinforcement learning (RL) fine‑tuning framework for electronic health record (EHR) foundation models, treating them as generative policies over patient trajectories. By framing clinical prediction tasks such as hospital readmission as event‑conditioned, time‑windowed reasoning problems and designing time‑aware, rollout‑sensitive rewards, the authors show that RL fine‑tuning consistently outperforms pre‑trained backbones and strong baselines. The approach enables smaller models to surpass larger pre‑trained models in data‑limited settings, induces positive transfer across tasks, and produces trajectories with stronger structural and semantic alignment to ground truth, improving downstream utility.

By Yuxin Xiao, Sheng Zhang, Chandan Singh, Tristan Naumann, Hoifung Poon, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong Liu