Large language models

Model releases, architecture work and prompting research on large language models — from frontier-lab announcements to the arXiv papers behind them.

28,685 stories · RSS feed

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

Can AI Reason Like an Urban Planner? Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Professional Judgment

Problem, Research Strategy, and Findings: The rise of large language models (LLMs) raises a key question for urban planning: which forms of professional planning knowledge can AI replicate, and which still require human judgment? Although AI tools are increasingly used in planning practice, there is still no systematic framework for testing whether they can reason with the contextual sensitivity, value awareness, and institutional literacy central to planning expertise.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

Probabilistic Salary Prediction with Graph Attention Networks and a Mixture Density Network

Accurate salary prediction is critical for bridging the information gap between employers and job seekers in modern labor markets. Existing approaches predominantly yield a single point estimate and treat job attributes such as location, occupation, and industry as independent categorical features, ignoring both the inherent uncertainty and multi-modality of real-world compensation data and the rich hierarchical and semantic-similarity relationships that govern pay norms.

arXiv AI
Jun 10

Fact-Augmented Lookahead Planning for LLM Agents

arXiv:2506. 09171v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly capable, but LLM agents still struggle to plan effectively in interactive, partially observable, long-horizon environments when search is unguided or recent history is insufficient.

By Samuel Holt, Max Ruiz Luyten, Thomas Pouplin, Mihaela van der Schaar
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Provenance-Grounded Gating and Adaptive Recovery in Synthetic Post-Training Data Curation

arXiv:2606. 11127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic post-training pipelines commonly filter generated samples with reward models or holistic LLM judges, yet two practices remain rarely examined together: whether the filtering signal is grounded in the source evidence that induced each generation, and whether rejected samples can be systematically recovered rather than permanently discarded.

By Soham Bhattacharjee, Karun Sharma, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu, Pratinav Seth