arXiv:2607. 03784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While prior studies have successfully compressed vision Transformers (ViTs) through various pruning techniques, most have concentrated on width pruning to achieve significant reductions in model size.
By Zhenfeng Su, Kang Zhao, Han Bao, Tao Yuan, Zhongzhe Hu, Xianzhi Yu, Wenxuan Wang
arXiv:2603. 12222v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision Transformers require significant computational resources and memory bandwidth, severely limiting their deployment on resource-constraint hardware.
By Andy Li, Aiden Durrant, Milan Markovic, Georgios Leontidis
arXiv:2606. 03428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The large sizes of Spiking Vision Transformers (SViTs) still hinder their embedded implementation, highlighting the need for model compression.
By Rachmad Vidya Wicaksana Putra, Achyuta Muthuvelan, Alberto Marchisio, Muhammad Shafique
arXiv:2606. 03257v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spiking Vision Transformer (SViT) models are promising low-power ViT models for solving vision-based tasks with state-of-the-art performance.
By Rachmad Vidya Wicaksana Putra, Achyuta Muthuvelan, Alberto Marchisio, Muhammad Shafique
The paper introduces a hardware‑aware framework that uses genetic programming to evolve layer‑specific scalar functions for Vision Transformers, replacing traditional LayerNorm with efficient, heterogeneous approximations. By applying a post‑training re‑alignment strategy, the method eliminates the need for full model retraining while achieving 90‑93% variance capture and recovering over 84% of ImageNet‑1K Top‑1 accuracy for ViT‑B and ViT‑L. The resulting architecture removes the global reduction bottleneck, reducing arithmetic complexity and off‑chip memory traffic, thereby enabling efficient deployment of ViTs on edge accelerators.
By Kieran Carrigg, Sigur de Vries, Amirhossein Sadough, Marcel van Gerven
arXiv:2608. 06901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable generalization across diverse multimodal tasks through large-scale pre-training, yet their rapidly increasing computational and memory requirements pose significant challenges for deployment in constrained environments.
By Minseok Kang, Hyunwoo Kim, Chanyoung Kim, Minwoo Kim, Jaekoo Lee, Dahuin Jung
arXiv:2604.13287v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Weight pruning is a common technique for compressing large neural networks. We focus on the challenging post-training one-shot setting, where a pre...
By Gabriel Afriat, Xiang Meng, Shibal Ibrahim, Hussein Hazimeh, Rahul Mazumder
arXiv:2506.11784v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Vision Transformers (ViTs) are essential in computer vision but are computationally intensive, too. Model quantization, particularly to low bit-wid...
By Guang Liang, Xinyao Liu, Jianxin Wu
arXiv:2607. 02612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision Transformers achieve strong image classification accuracy but process all image regions with nearly the same computation, even when many regions are redundant or uninformative.
By Aravind Pradeep, Samira Nazari, Mahdi Taheri, Christian Herglotz
arXiv:2607. 06982v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated encouraging results in image classification tasks.
By Hao Kong, Di Liu, Shuo Huai, Xiangzhong Luo, Ravi Subramaniam, Christian Makaya, Qian Lin, Weichen Liu
arXiv:2608. 05499v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern deep neural networks achieve strong performance, but their scale makes them costly and slow, especially on resource-constrained edge devices.
By Sadegh Jafari, Mohiuddin Bilwal, Fan Zhou, Brian Gelder, Ali Jannesari
The paper presents a novel multi‑exit computational scheme for TinyML on an ultra‑low‑power GAP9 SoC, adding confidence‑based gating points to a MobileNetV2 CNN for ImageNet‑100. By allowing inference to stop early, the approach cuts average MAC operations by 41 % (from 313 MMAC to 185 MMAC), reduces inference time by 29 % (49 ms to 35 ms), and saves 24 % in energy (2.1 mJ to 1.6 mJ per frame) with only a ~1 % drop in accuracy. Compared to a state‑of‑the‑art adaptive CNN on the same hardware, the method more than doubles computational efficiency, raising MAC/cycle from 8.1 to 17.2.
By Luca Crupi, Lorenzo Lamberti, Alessandro Giusti, Daniele Palossi