arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

CF-YOLO: Context-Aware Feature Refinement for Camouflaged Industrial Micro-Defect Detection

CF-YOLO introduces a real‑time detection framework for camouflaged micro‑defects on industrial components, combining a Context‑Perception Aggregation Module (CPAM) that fuses large‑kernel macro‑texture cues with small‑kernel boundary details, and a Feature Additive Refinement Module (FARM) that globally refines fine‑grained anomaly representations. The authors also release the Copper Tube Defect Dataset (CTDD), a benchmark of 1,847 images with 4,898 annotated defect boxes. Experiments show CF‑YOLO outperforms baseline detectors such as YOLOv11 by 2.2% in mAP@50 and 3.9% in Precision while preserving real‑time speed.

By Xinda Yu, Kunxin Zheng, Chunan Yu, Qingbo Song, Hao Xiao, Ying Zang, Jie Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Lowering the Barrier to AI-Driven Inspection: A No-Code Workflow for Automated Structural Defect Detection

The paper introduces YOLOEZ, a no-code, GUI-based tool that streamlines the entire YOLO model workflow—data labeling, training, and inference—for automated structural defect detection. It demonstrates that YOLOEZ outperforms traditional image‑processing methods across most detection metrics while simplifying deployment for users without programming expertise. The tool aims to lower technical barriers in structural health monitoring, enabling broader adoption of AI-driven inspection for predictive maintenance and intelligent structural systems.

By Michael Holm, Tanner McElroy, Xinghang Zhang, Guang Lin
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Does YOLO26 Truly Offer Advantages Over Its Predecessors for Edge Deployment? A Benchmark Study in Aquaculture

The paper evaluates the new YOLO26 architecture, which offers NMS-free end-to-end inference and is tailored for CPU-based edge devices, against three earlier Ultralytics models (YOLOv5u, YOLOv8, and YOLO11) in aquaculture fish mortality detection. Across nano, small, and medium scales, all models achieved similar detection accuracy on a full dataset, but differences emerged in data efficiency and deployment performance: YOLOv8 reached 90% mAP50 with only 400 images, while YOLO26 variants needed 1,000 images; YOLO26n was fastest on a Raspberry Pi 5 (7.51 FPS), whereas YOLOv5mu led on CPU-based hardware. The study concludes that architectural novelty alone does not dictate suitability for edge AI in aquaculture; training data size, target hardware, and inference needs must be jointly considered.

By Rakesh Ranjan, Gajanan S. Kothawade, Kata Sharrer, Scott Tsukuda, Christopher Good
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

TEEP-RCNN: Texture-Enhanced Edge-aware Perception for Steel Surface Defect Detection via Improved Convolutional Block Attention in Faster R-CNN

The paper introduces TEEP‑RCNN, a two‑stage detector that augments Faster R‑CNN with a Feature Pyramid Network backbone and an enhanced Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) featuring dropout in the channel attention MLP and batch‑norm in the spatial attention branch. Training employs a differential learning‑rate schedule with cosine‑annealing warm‑up, and inference uses Test‑Time Augmentation combined with Weighted Box Fusion to stabilize localization of elongated and boundary‑adjacent defects. On the NEU‑DET benchmark, TEEP‑RCNN attains 73.3 % mAP@50 and 37.9 % mAP@50‑95 in only ten epochs on a single GPU, matching or surpassing YOLOv11m while excelling on the rolled‑in‑scale defect category under the COCO metric.

By Kirtan Rajesh