arXiv:2608. 08408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Logics of abstraction in computational AI research often push important forms of knowledge and reflection aside: dominant standards of legitimacy separate from lived experience of harm; the goals of work misalign with the practices that operationalize them; and career demands crowd out critical reflection.
By Vyoma Raman, Isabel O. Gallegos, Neha Srivathsa
arXiv:2606. 17887v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) deployment in the workplace is accelerating rapidly.
By Dalia Ali, Maria Jos\'e Rodr\'iguez Vel\'azquez, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Vera Liao, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos
arXiv:2607. 28650v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While industry discourse often emphasizes immediate productivity gains and frames GenAI primarily as a tool for automation, the integration of GenAI into system administration may involve deeper shifts in professional practice that are not yet fully understood.
By Rana Abou Khamis, Hala Assal, Ashraf Matrawy
arXiv:2608. 14565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI safety research has mainly focused on two areas: technical alignment (ensuring AI systems produce human-aligned outputs) and the regulation of generative AI's societal impacts (including unemployment risk and labor market disruption).
By Jaeho Kim, Seokhyun Lee, Jieun Lee, Changhee Lee
arXiv:2608. 08601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To anticipate socio-technical risks from AI agents, organizations need taxonomies to classify them.
By Gabriele La Malfa, Lakmal Meegahapola, Edyta Bogucka, Jie M. Zhang, Michael Luck, Elizabeth Black, Daniele Quercia
arXiv:2606. 01171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) can reproduce and amplify the structural inequities faced by minoritized communities.
By Tijs Portegies, Laureanne Willems, Maaike Harbers, Giovanni Sileno, Roland van Dierendonck, Mayesha Tasnim, Lotte Willemsen, Sennay Ghebreab