arXiv AI By Vignesh Nagarajan

CANVAS: Captioning Art with Narrative Visual-Audio AI Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 09846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual art remains largely inaccessible to blind and low-vision (BLV) audiences due to brief or absent alt-text, which rarely conveys the sensory, spatial, or emotional qualities of an artwork.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 30

MuseBench: Benchmarking Intent-Level Audiovisual Arts Understanding in MLLMs

arXiv:2606. 30026v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audiovisual arts encompass diverse creative disciplines, including cinema, visual arts, stage performance, and game design, where artistic meaning arises from deliberate combinations of visual, auditory, and narrative elements (e.

By Yuxuan Fan, Gyusik Seo, Jing Hao, Jaemin Cho, Mohit Bansal, Jaehong Yoon
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

What, When, and How: Audio Description as Constrained Global Optimization

The paper presents a new approach to automatic audio description (AD) that treats the task as a constrained global optimization problem. It jointly decides what visual content is narratively important, when it can be spoken without overlapping dialogue, and how to phrase it within time limits. Using large language models for salience estimation and a mixed‑integer linear program for scheduling, the system outperforms prior methods on the REFRAMED benchmark, especially in temporal placement and narrative relevance.

By Igor Sterner, Mirella Lapata, Alex Lascarides, Frank Keller
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Text-Driven Artistic Staging: 3D Posing, Lighting, and Camera References from Paintings

The paper presents a method for generating 3D staging—human poses, lighting, and camera setup—directly from affective textual descriptions. It builds a dataset of 11,911 text–staging pairs derived from 2,328 figurative paintings, reconstructing SMPL bodies, estimating illumination, and recovering camera parameters. A flow‑matching transformer is trained to produce variable‑size scenes and multiple staging alternatives, achieving a 32.2% retrieval R@1 on held‑out prompts, outperforming a CLIP‑based baseline.

By Yunge Wen