arXiv Machine Learning
Bayesian Causal Forests for Zero-Inflated Continuous Outcomes
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Statistics ML
Aug 21
Causal Generalization of Continuous Treatment Effects under Covariate Shift
arXiv:2608. 19383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Average dose-response functions are widely used to summarize causal effects of continuous treatments, but most existing methods assume that the observed sample represents the target population.
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago
Flexible Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Inference for Censored Outcomes
arXiv:2610.20893v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Estimating causal effects on right-censored time-to-event outcomes is challenging under unmeasured confounding. Proximal causal inference addresses u...
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means
arXiv:2606. 01184v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean: they can split a population into disconnected regimes, create loops or holes, generate branches, or reorganize an outcome cloud while leaving the average response nearly unchanged.
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 5
Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model
The paper introduces new one‑step and targeted minimum loss‑based estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under the front‑door criterion. These estimators use multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, can avoid modeling the mediator density, and are compatible with flexible machine‑learning nuisance estimation. The authors derive conditions for root‑n consistency, asymptotic linearity, and develop doubly robust tests for identification assumptions, demonstrating improved efficiency and favorable performance in simulations and real‑world applications in education and emergency medicine.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30
From Unsupervised Subgroups to Hypothetical State-Intervention Policies: An Evaluation of Selected Subgrouping Methods in Observational Health Data
arXiv:2607. 26521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional subgroup analyses can yield unstable and difficult-to-interpret conclusions, especially in observational biomedical data where each individual is observed under only one exposure state, true individual treatment effects are unavailable, and causal structure is uncertain.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27
LLM-Extracted Covariates for Clinical Causal Inference: Rethinking Integration Strategies
arXiv:2604. 16763v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Causal inference from electronic health records (EHR) is fundamentally limited by unmeasured confounding: critical clinical states such as frailty, goals of care, and mental status are documented in free-text notes but absent from structured data.