arXiv:2507. 20993v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study how to learn treatment policies from multimodal electronic health records (EHRs) that consist of tabular data and clinical text.
By Henri Arno, Thomas Demeester
arXiv:2604. 23904v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Synthetic tabular data are often evaluated by distributional similarity, privacy distance, or train-on-synthetic-test-on-real predictive performance, but these criteria do not ensure validity for causal inference.
By Yichen Xu
arXiv:2609.06294v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) enables efficient targeting of interventions, but many applications have limited experimental s...
By Maitreyi Swaroop, Shikha Bhat, Samantha Rodriguez, Tamar Krishnamurti, Bryan Wilder
The paper introduces information set emulation, a method that attaches detailed causal certificates—such as source evidence, timing, and proposed causal roles—to AI‑derived features extracted from electronic health records (EHRs). These certificates provide auditable evidence for causal roles and guide whether a feature can be used for causal inference or should be routed to compatible reporting or separate analyses. The framework integrates with a joint EHR observation map and offers identification, estimation, and diagnostic tools under standard causal assumptions, illustrated through synthetic simulations and a finite‑world example.
By Takes Fujita (VRI), Nobutaka Hattori (Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine)
arXiv:2603. 19186v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects, yet they are often underpowered for detecting effect heterogeneity.
By Amir Asiaee, Samhita Pal
arXiv:2607. 27224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: External and synthetic control arms (ECAs) are entering psychiatric drug development, but the field lacks a benchmark that evaluates the properties regulators care about: not only how accurately a method reconstructs untreated trajectories, but whether its uncertainty is calibrated, whether it is robust to the informative observation times common in mental-health records (sicker patients are seen more often), and what false-positive rate it induces in go/no-go trial decisions.
By Aakash Bhagat, Shashank Choudhary