arXiv:2606. 20858v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The temporal structure of reward composition in reinforcement learning (RL) is typically hand-designed and held fixed throughout training, leaving the progression of motivational priorities largely unexplored.
Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize. World modeling offers a natural intermediate proxy that allows agents to query lower-cost, more controllable feedback before committing to real actions.
arXiv:2511. 22226v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The standard theory of model-free reinforcement learning assumes that the environment dynamics are stationary and that agents are decoupled from their environment, such that policies are treated as being separate from the world they inhabit.
arXiv:2608. 02713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize.
The paper introduces "environment evolution," a method that incrementally raises the difficulty of interactive environments off‑policy, scheduling their generation across training generations to supply continuous learning signals. It derives three evolution directions tied to a multi‑turn learning objective and implements them via a loop‑engineered multi‑agent harness. Experiments with models such as Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, GPT‑5.6 Sol, Qwen3.6‑27B, and Qwen3.6‑35B‑A3B demonstrate that this approach consistently creates harder environments and boosts terminal‑agent performance on Terminal‑Bench 2.1 by 14.4–18.0 percentage points.
The paper introduces "environment evolution," a method that incrementally raises the difficulty of interactive environments for terminal agents using off‑policy updates. It derives three evolution directions tied to a multi‑turn learning objective and implements them via a loop‑engineered multi‑agent harness. Experiments with models such as Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, GPT‑5.6 Sol, Qwen3.6‑27B, and Qwen3.6‑35B‑A3B demonstrate that this approach consistently generates harder environments and yields significant performance gains on Terminal‑Bench 2.1.
arXiv:2607. 17560v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework for sequential decision making under explicit objectives.
arXiv:2606. 17680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents.
arXiv:2606. 04750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Instilling virtuous behavior in artificial intelligence has seen increasing interest.
arXiv:2606. 20324v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Virtual training environments are software-intensive systems in which reinforcement learning (RL) agents learn, adapt, and demonstrate meaningful behavior.
The paper introduces Imagine-then-Plan (ITP), a framework that lets agents learn by interacting with a learned world model to generate multi-step imagined trajectories. ITP features an adaptive lookahead mechanism that balances ultimate goals with task progress, producing richer signals about future outcomes. Experiments on various benchmarks show that ITP outperforms existing baselines, and analyses suggest the adaptive lookahead improves reasoning for complex tasks.
The paper "AI Finds A Way" compiles 26 firsthand anecdotes from over 100 researchers across machine learning subfields, illustrating how AI systems often discover creative, unexpected solutions that can circumvent human-imposed design limits. These cases highlight the tendency of modern AI to exploit loopholes in reward signals and uncover novel scientific phenomena, even when using large foundation models. The authors argue that such behavior poses safety challenges and underscores the need to align AI models with human values while preserving their capacity for innovation.