HANS is a new handwritten answer sheet dataset designed to reflect the complexities of real‑world student submissions, including multi‑line derivations, mixed text and math, hand‑drawn tables, and noise such as strikethroughs and corrections. The dataset comes with fine‑grained annotations to support robust recognition research. Using HANS, the authors also introduce NA‑GOT, an end‑to‑end framework that applies two‑stage noise suppression and a noise‑aware attention mechanism, achieving notable gains in accuracy and stability for answer process recognition.
arXiv:2606. 11477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Correcting handwritten exams by hand is time-consuming and error-prone, particularly for large cohorts, while fully digital exams tend to force a didactic narrowing towards closed question formats.
arXiv:2607. 18767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of Small Language Models (SLMs) in educational settings offers significant advantages in terms of privacy, cost, and scalability.
OmniHandwritingOCR is a diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and OCR systems on handwritten text and mathematical expression recognition. It comprises 77.57K labeled images across six subtasks and twelve subsets, including a difficulty‑stratified multi‑line formula corpus that tests robustness to increasing structural complexity. The benchmark reveals that current systems perform poorly on complex multi‑line formulas, exhibit variable rankings across languages and formula settings, and sometimes hallucinate corrections that are not visually supported.
The paper "Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education" argues that existing LLM‑generated text detectors assume a binary human/LLM distinction, which fails to capture realistic student‑AI collaboration. It introduces a contribution‑aware evaluation framework with eight student contribution levels and presents GEDE, a benchmark of over 900 human‑written and 12,500 generated essays across 886 tasks. Using GEDE, the authors evaluate four detection methods and find that most detectors perform poorly on intermediate contribution levels, especially LLM‑assisted revisions, raising concerns about false accusations.
arXiv:2602. 01747v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated Essay Scoring (AES) plays a crucial role in education by providing scalable and efficient assessment tools.
arXiv:2609.23573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic essays can help reduce dependence on human-written data in Automated Essay Scoring (AES). However, they often lack realistic errors, limiting...
WildHandBench is a new benchmark comprising 500 handwritten documents that span free text, tables, and formulas across four languages and nine real‑world scenarios. It introduces a Prior‑Driven Error (PDE) metric to assess whether mistakes stem from language priors rather than visual cues. In tests of 18 state‑of‑the‑art models, the best achieves only 71.85% accuracy, while humans reach 77.09%, and model errors are largely prior‑driven (63‑91%) compared to human errors (49%).
arXiv:2606. 24973v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a dataset of 32,534 double-marked real student responses to GCSE mock exams (GCSEs are the UK's national exams, taken at age ~16), spanning 328 questions across five subjects and including handwritten work.
arXiv:2307. 14544v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents an artificial intelligence tool designed to assist students with dyslexia, ADHD, and short attention spans in processing text-based information more efficiently.
The paper introduces a cost‑aware framework that treats each prompt type as an arm in a multi‑armed bandit controller, enabling adaptive selection of optimal prompting strategies during inference for automated essay scoring. Experiments on IELTS Writing Task 2 essays demonstrate that this bandit-driven approach achieves comparable scoring accuracy to exhaustive grid search while reducing LLM calls by 78.4%. The study also presents the first cost‑reliability learning curves for essay scoring, offering actionable insights for educational technology platforms balancing operational costs against assessment validity.
arXiv:2607. 14524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This study presents WrAFT, a Writing Assessment and Feedback Tool, that delivers both accurate and reliable scores and effective comprehensive feedback to argumentative essays.
RefLAM is a pipeline that converts manuscript page images and clean transcriptions into validated, line-level ground truth for Arabic handwritten text recognition. It combines a deep‑learning page‑segmentation model, a multimodal large language model for structured OCR, and a diacritic‑agnostic fuzzy alignment engine that assigns a confidence score to each line, with a provable correctness guarantee for perfect scores. Using RefLAM, the authors achieved a 75× speedup over manual annotation and released AraMS‑28k, a dataset of 14 historical Arabic manuscripts with detailed annotations.