arXiv:2609.24859v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The ideation phase of participatory AI risk assessment often starts with a blank slate or a limited list of predefined risks, making it difficult to...
By Ke Zhou, Edyta Bogucka, Daniele Quercia
arXiv:2608. 08601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To anticipate socio-technical risks from AI agents, organizations need taxonomies to classify them.
By Gabriele La Malfa, Lakmal Meegahapola, Edyta Bogucka, Jie M. Zhang, Michael Luck, Elizabeth Black, Daniele Quercia
arXiv:2505. 10300v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Responsible AI (RAI) efforts increasingly emphasize the importance of addressing potential harms early in the AI development lifecycle through social-technical lenses.
By Muzhe Wu, Yanzhi Zhao, Shuyi Han, Michael Xieyang Liu, Hong Shen
arXiv:2606. 09848v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative and agentic AI becomes embedded in everyday products, practitioners face a persistent challenge: how to design human-AI coordination -- the ongoing mutual adjustment between users and AI systems as mediate through interfaces-that supports usability, trust, and safety.
By James Pierce, Vaiva Kalnikait\.e, Siddharth Gupta, Brian Granger
arXiv:2606. 05178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI-driven product development accelerates, the bottleneck is shifting from how we build to what we build.
By Tim Dorn, Saara A. Khan, Julie Mumford
arXiv:2607. 03233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of publicly available digital information has rendered manual open-source intelligence (OSINT) analysis insufficient for modern intelligence, cybersecurity, and cyber investigation.
By Eduardo Almeida Palmieri, Mohamed Chahine Ghanem, Dipo Dunsin, Zubair Baig, Ed de Quincey, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve. In conventional transcript-based multi-agent systems, humans typically provide an initial problem, agents deliberate internally, and the system returns a final response.
arXiv:2605. 27395v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As the rapid proliferation of AI systems and harms spurs efforts in AI governance around the world, prioritizing among competing policy options has become increasingly challenging for policymakers and researchers.
By Julia Barnett, Kimon Kieslich, Natali Helberger, Nicholas Diakopoulos
PersonaTeaming introduces a workflow that incorporates personas into adversarial prompt generation for generative AI, achieving higher attack success rates than the state‑of‑the‑art RainbowPlus while preserving prompt diversity. The system is extended into a user‑facing playground that lets red‑teamers create their own personas and collaborate with AI to refine prompts, fostering diverse strategies. A user study with 11 industry practitioners found the playground produced useful outputs and encouraged out‑of‑the‑box thinking, even when suggestions were not strictly followed.
By Wesley Hanwen Deng, Mingxi Yan, Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Akshita Jha, Lauren Wilcox, Kenneth Holstein, Motahhare Eslami, Leon A. Gatys
arXiv:2606. 11835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Collecting participants' lived experiences is central to design research.
By Zhiqing Wang, Steven Dow
arXiv:2608. 13046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve.
By Sanjeev Manivannan
arXiv:2606. 15485v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI systems act autonomously, use tools, adapt to context, and operate in complex real-world environments.
By Hao-Ping Lee, Jessica He, David Piorkowski, Thomas Serban von Davier, Jodi Forlizzi, Sauvik Das