arXiv AI By Julia Barnett, Kimon Kieslich, Natali Helberger, Nicholas Diakopoulos

Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2605. 27395v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As the rapid proliferation of AI systems and harms spurs efforts in AI governance around the world, prioritizing among competing policy options has become increasingly challenging for policymakers and researchers.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 19

Measuring Biological Capabilities and Risks of AI Agents

arXiv:2606. 19899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper addresses a rapidly emerging policy challenge: how to generate and interpret credible evidence about the biological capabilities and risks of AI scientists, or agentic AI systems capable of autonomously or collaboratively performing multi-step scientific tasks.

By Patricia Paskov, Jeffrey Lee, Kyle Brady, Alyssa Worland
arXiv AI
Jul 7

The Foreign Policy AI Evaluation Gap

arXiv:2607. 02955v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We argue that AI systems used in conducting foreign policy tasks - broadly enacting 'statecraft' - should be a priority test case for technical AI governance research.

By Charles Pozniak, Jeba Sania
arXiv AI
Jul 1

RCTs for Frontier AI Governance: Methodological Challenges and Solutions for Human Uplift Studies

arXiv:2603. 11001v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human uplift studies, or studies that measure the effects of AI access on human performance via randomized controlled trials (RCT) or similar methodologies, increasingly inform frontier AI governance and deployment decisions.

By Patricia Paskov, Kevin Wei, Shen Zhou Hong, Dan Bateyko, Xavier Roberts-Gaal, Carson Ezell, Gailius Praninskas, Valerie Chen, Umang Bhatt, Ella Guest