arXiv AI

Who Laughs with Whom? Disentangling Influential Factors in Humor Preferences across User Clusters and LLMs

arXiv AI
Oct 2

Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor

The paper investigates automated reward systems for training language models in conversational humor, examining how reward exploits can undermine intended behavior. It evaluates two reward approaches—an embedding-based surprise reward and an audience-model laughter prediction—showing that each can be tricked by word shuffling or laughter cues, respectively. Countermeasures such as fluency filtering and cue normalization mitigate some attacks but also risk rejecting genuine witty responses, highlighting the difficulty of designing robust rewards.

By Sam Larson
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Jokes Aside: Measuring the Semantic Distance of Double Meanings

The paper investigates how semantic distance and ambiguity contribute to joke humor by revisiting and extending metrics from prior work. It introduces a new symmetry metric—measuring how close the ambiguous element Z is to both X and Y—and evaluates it using two embedding models on three joke datasets, including expanded versions with paired ambiguous sentences. Although models based on these metrics performed poorly in predicting humor ratings, the symmetry metric consistently correlated with higher-rated jokes, hinting it captures a key, though not sole, property of humor.

By Fabio De Ponte
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

MultiHuSE: A Multimodal Dataset for Humour Styles and Emotions

MultiHuSE is a multimodal dataset featuring 2,407 high‑definition videos of 50 diverse actors delivering 1,463 text samples in four psychological humour styles—affiliative, aggressive, self‑enhancing, and self‑deprecating—plus neutral content. Each text is performed by multiple actors, allowing analysis of expressive diversity, and a subset includes emotion annotations. Baseline experiments show that multimodal fusion improves humour style classification accuracy over unimodal approaches, especially for affiliative humour.

By Mary Ogbuka Kenneth, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat
arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

Spotting the Artificial: Dialogic Humor Improvisation in Humans and LLMs

The paper introduces a method to compare human and large language model (LLM) outputs in the context of humorous improvisational dialogue. Using a multi‑agent environment, the authors analyze both automated linguistic metrics and manual annotations based on Systemic Functional Linguistics. Findings reveal that while LLMs can produce coherent and creative scenes, they often lack the spontaneity of human interaction and tend to be overly polite, unlike the varied attitudes seen in human comedy.

By Lizeth Palacios Pati\~no, Ximena Gutierrez-Vasques, Daniel Rodriguez