arXiv AI By Xiaohui Rao, Hanlin Wu, Zhenguang G. Cai

A funny companion: Distinct neural responses to AI- versus human-attributed humor

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2509. 10847v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) companions become capable of human-like communication, including telling jokes, understanding how people cognitively and affectively respond to AI-attributed humor becomes increasingly important.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Timing is Everything: Temporal Scaffolding of Semantic Surprise in Humor

The paper introduces the Dual Prediction Violation (DPV) framework to study how timing and semantic surprise interact in humor. Analyzing 828 Chinese stand‑up performances, it finds that temporal features—especially pauses before high‑surprise punchlines—are more predictive of audience appreciation than overall semantic incongruity. The study reframes humor as a temporally scaffolded phenomenon where timing and content coordinate strategically rather than independently.

By Yuxi Ma, Yongqian Peng, Junchen Lyu, Chi Zhang, Yixin Zhu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

MultiHuSE: A Multimodal Dataset for Humour Styles and Emotions

MultiHuSE is a multimodal dataset featuring 2,407 high‑definition videos of 50 diverse actors delivering 1,463 text samples in four psychological humour styles—affiliative, aggressive, self‑enhancing, and self‑deprecating—plus neutral content. Each text is performed by multiple actors, allowing analysis of expressive diversity, and a subset includes emotion annotations. Baseline experiments show that multimodal fusion improves humour style classification accuracy over unimodal approaches, especially for affiliative humour.

By Mary Ogbuka Kenneth, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat
arXiv AI
2d ago

Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor

The paper investigates automated reward systems for training language models in conversational humor, examining how reward exploits can undermine intended behavior. It evaluates two reward approaches—an embedding-based surprise reward and an audience-model laughter prediction—showing that each can be tricked by word shuffling or laughter cues, respectively. Countermeasures such as fluency filtering and cue normalization mitigate some attacks but also risk rejecting genuine witty responses, highlighting the difficulty of designing robust rewards.

By Sam Larson
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Jokes Aside: Measuring the Semantic Distance of Double Meanings

The paper investigates how semantic distance and ambiguity contribute to joke humor by revisiting and extending metrics from prior work. It introduces a new symmetry metric—measuring how close the ambiguous element Z is to both X and Y—and evaluates it using two embedding models on three joke datasets, including expanded versions with paired ambiguous sentences. Although models based on these metrics performed poorly in predicting humor ratings, the symmetry metric consistently correlated with higher-rated jokes, hinting it captures a key, though not sole, property of humor.

By Fabio De Ponte