arXiv:2509. 10847v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) companions become capable of human-like communication, including telling jokes, understanding how people cognitively and affectively respond to AI-attributed humor becomes increasingly important.
By Xiaohui Rao, Hanlin Wu, Zhenguang G. Cai
arXiv:2601.03103v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Humor preferences vary widely across individuals and cultures, complicating the evaluation of humor using large language models (LLMs). In th...
By Soichiro Murakami, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Hiroya Takamura, Manabu Okumura
MultiHuSE is a multimodal dataset featuring 2,407 high‑definition videos of 50 diverse actors delivering 1,463 text samples in four psychological humour styles—affiliative, aggressive, self‑enhancing, and self‑deprecating—plus neutral content. Each text is performed by multiple actors, allowing analysis of expressive diversity, and a subset includes emotion annotations. Baseline experiments show that multimodal fusion improves humour style classification accuracy over unimodal approaches, especially for affiliative humour.
By Mary Ogbuka Kenneth, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat
arXiv:2607. 19011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal humor in memes, cartoons, and comics remains difficult for AI systems because intended meaning depends on non-literal mechanisms, shared cultural knowledge, and communicative intent rather than literal scene description.
By Tuo Liang, Zhe Hu, Disheng Liu, Jing Li, Yu Yin
arXiv:2606. 00046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video platforms such as YouTube have reshaped how users engage with entertainment and information, emphasizing brief, highly engaging content such as Shorts.
By Sydney Johns, Sanjeev Parthasarathy, Shantnu Bhalla, Vaibhav Garg
The paper investigates automated reward systems for training language models in conversational humor, examining how reward exploits can undermine intended behavior. It evaluates two reward approaches—an embedding-based surprise reward and an audience-model laughter prediction—showing that each can be tricked by word shuffling or laughter cues, respectively. Countermeasures such as fluency filtering and cue normalization mitigate some attacks but also risk rejecting genuine witty responses, highlighting the difficulty of designing robust rewards.
By Sam Larson