Efficient Federated Conformal Prediction with Group-Conditional Guarantee
arXiv:2603. 14198v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying trustworthy AI systems requires principled uncertainty quantification.
Stochastic Grouping Conformal Prediction (SGCP) is a new framework that provides distribution‑free coverage guarantees while addressing coverage disparities across clinically important subgroups. SGCP learns a stochastic grouping map so that each sample can draw calibration data from others with similar calibration behavior, creating a local score law that improves reliability for all subpopulations. The authors prove that SGCP maintains the standard coverage guarantee and demonstrate through synthetic and real‑world experiments that it reduces subgroup coverage gaps while keeping prediction set sizes small or comparable to existing methods.
arXiv:2603. 14198v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying trustworthy AI systems requires principled uncertainty quantification.
arXiv:2607. 16675v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A point prediction that is well calibrated on average can still be systematically biased conditional on its own value, undermining its use in downstream decision-making.
arXiv:2602. 01733v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal Prediction (CP) provides a statistical framework for uncertainty quantification that constructs prediction sets with coverage guarantees.
arXiv:2601. 21455v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction(CP) has become a cornerstone of distribution-free uncertainty quantification, conventionally evaluated by its coverage and interval length.
arXiv:2505. 08784v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As machine learning (ML) enters high-stakes domains, trustworthy uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safety.
arXiv:2605. 20468v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Effective medication management in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is challenging due to heterogeneous disease progression, variable patient response, and medication side effects.
arXiv:2607.16675v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A predictor with small overall bias can still exhibit systematic bias conditional on its predicted value, limiting its reliability for downstream u...
arXiv:2606. 14909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We consider the problem of uncertainty quantification for a pretrained classification model deployed under unknown distribution shift.
The paper introduces a missingness‑aware conformal calibration method for mortality prediction that accounts for cross‑hospital distribution shifts. By selecting a measurement on an independent sample, grouping patients by whether that measurement is recorded, and applying Mondrian calibration within each group, the method avoids reusing calibration outcomes. Experiments on eICU and MIMIC‑IV data show that, compared to pooled calibration, it reduces the worst‑group coverage gap by a median of 1.9 percentage points across six settings, though the benefit varies with predictor and hospital.
arXiv:2509. 15120v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In high-stakes scenarios, such as medical imaging applications, it is critical to equip the predictions of a regression model with reliable confidence intervals.
arXiv:2501.18060v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal inference provides a rigorous statistical framework for uncertainty quantification in machine learning, enabling well-calibrated pr...
The paper investigates how uncertainty quantification fails in selective prediction systems when clinical data exhibit severe class imbalance, leading to systematic exclusion of minority patients. Through experiments on 56 synthetic scenarios and three neurodegenerative disease cohorts, the authors show that standard uncertainty measures become proxies for class membership rather than true ambiguity, and that combining class‑aware correction (CCR) with threshold‑aware metrics restores proper monotonicity and protects minority patients. The study proposes adopting threshold‑aligned uncertainty measures and class‑stratified evaluation to mitigate this bias and improve safety in clinical AI pipelines.