LogiScope‑VQA is a new benchmark dataset for evaluating vision‑language models in logistics hazard identification. It contains 2,476 images, 2,918 videos, and 10,274 VQA pairs drawn from real industrial warehouses, covering 18 core objects and 20 risk types across 39 subtasks. Experiments show that even advanced proprietary models lag behind human experts, highlighting a significant gap in perception, understanding, and reasoning for industrial safety.
By Hanjing Zhou, Mingze Yin, Ying Lian, Jun Ma, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Yanbing Zhou
arXiv:2606. 15749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traffic scene understanding requires models to reason beyond object recognition, including lane topology, multi-view geometry, temporal evolution, and signal-phase semantics.
By Maonan Wang, Zhengyan Huang, Kemou Jiang, Yuhang Fu, Jiayue Zhu, Yuxin Cai, Xingchen Zou, Qiaosheng Zhang, Yi Yu, Ding Wang, Xi Chen, Ben M. Chen, Yuxuan Liang, Zhiyong Cui, Man On Pun, Yirong Chen
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) large-scale deployment in industrial warehouse settings specifically necessitates that models exhibit human-expert-level hazard-oriented perception, understanding, and r...
arXiv:2609.09396v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) advance toward physical deployment, the focus has remained on action-oriented Embodied AI evaluated on subject-centric...
By Zaid Pervaiz Bhat, Nimra Nayyar, Arihant Jain, Lap Fung Chan, John Suchanek, Yu Wang, Varun Praveen, Tomasz Kornuta, Vidya Nariyambut Murali
VTOS (Vision Tools Orchestration Search) is a framework that adaptively orchestrates vision foundation tools—such as open‑vocabulary detectors, segmentation models, and post‑processing operators—by jointly searching for executable solution programs and observer programs that diagnose failures and provide feedback. The observer programs feed observations into a shared VisionThoughts knowledge base, guiding subsequent searches. In two case studies—dense object counting on LVIS‑Count and zero‑shot plant‑disease segmentation on PlantSeg‑OOD—VTOS outperforms static tool pipelines and agentic visual‑programming baselines, especially in complex scenarios like dense, occluded scenes and out‑of‑distribution segmentation.
By Jinchao Ge, Lingqiao Liu, Shuwen Zhao, Lei Wang
arXiv:2606. 24759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for autonomous driving scene understanding, yet existing methods still face a fundamental trade-off between temporal reasoning and spatial precision.
By Xiaowei Gao, Pengxiang Li, Yitai Cheng, Ruihan Xu, James Haworth, Stephen Law, Yun Ye
End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems remains largely opaque, due to the complexity of traffic scenes.
arXiv:2607. 08970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for VLMs largely assess single- or limited-view perception, leaving untested the core cognitive ability to integrate observations across viewpoints into a coherent, world-centric (allocentric) 3D mental model.
By Hantao Zhang, Jinru Sui, Ed Li, Dirk Bergemann, Zhuoran Yang
arXiv:2606. 09882v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The paradigm of digital twin cities is shifting from coarse visual mapping toward more precise and actionable digitization of urban assets.
By Chong Liu, Luxuan Fu, Xuyu Feng, Zhen Dong, Bisheng Yang
arXiv:2608. 09230v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial-safety understanding requires more than detecting workers, equipment, and personal protective equipment.
By Yuanchi Zhu, Kang An, Tengyue Wang, Zhongyu Yang, Chenxu Du, Xinqi Yang, Hebao Zhu, Bokai Zhao, Tianyu Liang, Ziliang Wang, Faqiang Qian, Yunli Yang, Weiyang Shi, Qibing Ren
arXiv:2607. 16243v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal industrial anomaly inspection assistants are a critical component of next-generation smart factories, enabling interactive vision-language-based querying.
By Anushiya Arunan, Xin Li, Yan Qin, U-Xuan Tan, Nhu Khue Vuong, Xiaoli Li, Chau Yuen
While vision-language models excel at general multimodal understanding, they still struggle with visual spatial planning. We attribute this to a perception-reasoning modality gap: visual planning requires models to infer latent state structures from pixels and then reason over the recovered structure to produce valid actions, whereas symbolic planning directly leverages explicit objects and constraints.