arXiv:2607. 13682v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Radiative Gaussian splatting reconstructs sparse-view CT fast and accurately, and recent work attaches per-Gaussian posteriors to yield per-voxel uncertainty maps.
Sparse-view computed tomography is a severely ill-posed inverse problem, where recent 3D Gaussian Splatting methods offer an efficient explicit representation for tomographic reconstruction. However, we find that projection-domain optimization can be misleading in this setting: the rendered projections may continue to improve while the reconstructed volume deteriorates.
arXiv:2608.29705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Feed-forward 3D reconstruction models emit a per-pixel confidence that downstream systems read as a reliability signal. It is trained as a loss weigh...
Limited-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reconstructs a volume from a few low-dose projections over a narrow arc. At a representative nine-view, $25^{\circ}$ protocol more than 98% of image space is unmeasured, so a learned prior must supply structure in the missing wedge.
arXiv:2607. 05522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: 3D Gaussian splatting (3DGS) is a strong representation for real-time novel-view synthesis, but its standard training pipeline relies on point estimates and hand-tuned heuristics, providing no native uncertainty or principled complexity control.
arXiv:2606.25483v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Path-traced synthetic stereo is a primary training substrate for disparity networks, and the pipelines that consume it assume Monte~Carlo (MC) rend...
The paper introduces CalSAM, a lightweight adaptation framework that fine‑tunes only the mask decoder of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) while keeping its encoders frozen. CalSAM employs a Feature Fisher Information Penalty (FIP) to reduce encoder sensitivity to domain shift and a Confidence Misalignment Penalty (CMP) to curb overconfident voxel‑wise errors. Experiments on cross‑center, scanner‑shift, and motion‑corrupted brain MRI datasets show significant gains in Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and expected calibration error, with only a modest training‑time overhead.
arXiv:2607. 22824v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Comparing CT reconstruction methods fairly is labor-intensive and largely manual, and many benchmarks use idealized data.
arXiv:2609.37605v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised deep learning has advanced sparse-view tomographic reconstruction. However, conventional models, which typically map filtered back-project...
Gauss What You Need: Compact Gaussian Splatting Across Scene Scales introduces TangoGS, a method that automatically selects the number of Gaussian primitives for 3D Gaussian Splatting by combining capture-derived model sizing with training-based adaptation. The approach first estimates a learning allowance based on the capture’s total pixels, then adjusts the number of Gaussians during training according to reconstruction quality. On standard benchmarks, TangoGS matches the best baseline’s PSNR while using 48% fewer Gaussians, and on larger captures it scales automatically to achieve the highest mean PSNR with 2.3× more Gaussians.
The paper audits the confidence outputs of seven feed‑forward 3D reconstruction backbones across 13 datasets, evaluating four properties: error ranking, average error‑to‑uncertainty ratio, slope of this ratio, and coverage of the implied error distribution. While confidence ranks errors well, the decoded uncertainty is consistently too small—off by at least 2.4× on median cases—and worsens with higher confidence. A post‑hoc power‑law fit per backbone‑dataset pair improves all four metrics at the dataset level, reducing the median error by 1.35×, but fails to correct coverage for many held‑out scenes, indicating the models lack the correct error scale and distribution shape.
The paper examines how residual misalignments from registration procedures introduce structured label noise in supervised synthetic CT (sCT) generation. It shows that voxel‑wise metrics are heavily influenced by the consistency between training and evaluation registrations, and that training with anatomically consistent registrations reduces variability and improves robustness. Introducing a perceptual loss based on a pretrained Segment Anything encoder yields sharper, more anatomically coherent sCT and highlights the need for anatomy‑oriented evaluation.