arXiv AI
A Calibration Audit of Confidence in Feed-Forward 3D Reconstruction
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4
Posterior Variance Is a Constraint Map, Not an Error Map: Closed-Form Uncertainty for Radiative Gaussian Splatting in Sparse-View CT
arXiv:2607. 13682v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Radiative Gaussian splatting reconstructs sparse-view CT fast and accurately, and recent work attaches per-Gaussian posteriors to yield per-voxel uncertainty maps.
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 21
Calibrated Triage, Not Autonomy: Confidence Estimation for Medical Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2606. 15910v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A vision-language model can answer a question about a chest radiograph or a pathology slide fluently and confidently while barely using the image, relying instead on language priors.
arXiv Computer Vision
1d ago
Hold-Out Self-Validation Cannot Certify Photogrammetric Accuracy: Saturation and Blindness to Coherent Distortion
arXiv:2607.24852v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Internal self-consistency cannot certify the accuracy of a photogrammetric reconstruction, and the failure is structural rather than a matter of tu...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12
The Evaluation Protocol Determines the Result: An Independent Reproduction of LeWorldModel on TwoRoom
arXiv:2608. 10145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LeWorldModel trains a latent world model with a prediction loss and a single anti-collapse regulariser, and reports approximately 87% of goals reached on TwoRoom, its simplest diagnostic environment.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 14
Excess Separability: Nuisance-Controlled Residual-Stream Probing for Benchmark Contamination Detection
arXiv:2608. 12652v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark contamination is diagnosed today with n-gram overlap, with likelihood-based membership inference, or with canary strings, and each needs something usually unavailable: the training corpus, a well-chosen test statistic, or foresight at dataset release.
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27
Reliability analysis for BraTS-GoAT segmentation: a controlled robustness study of deep-ensemble uncertainty
The study evaluates the reliability of deep‑ensemble uncertainty for brain tumour segmentation on the BraTS‑GoAT dataset. A 5‑fold cross‑validated nnU‑Net baseline and a 3‑seed deep ensemble were compared for calibration and error detection; the ensemble showed modest gains in calibration on in‑distribution data but the single model’s confidence remained flat while accuracy degraded under synthetic corruptions. Disagreement among ensemble members rose sharply with corruption severity, proving to be a more sensitive indicator of acquisition shift than single‑model confidence.