The paper introduces the Fixed Suffix Dependency Ratio (FSDR) as a metric to measure how much loanwords depend on fixed derivational suffixes for gender assignment. Analyzing 1,832 Latvian noun lemmas, it finds that feminine loanwords rely more on fixed suffixes while masculine loanwords are largely free‑choice, a pattern that has intensified in recent usage. FSDR offers a quantitative tool for distinguishing morphological anchoring from default gender in language contact scenarios.
By Yelingyun Zhang, Atis Kapenieks, Marina Platonova
arXiv:2502.10577v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Instruct-based large language models (LLMs) have been shown to propagate and even amplify gender bias when prompted with contextually constra...
By Enzo Doyen, Amalia Todirascu
arXiv:2608. 08606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine translation (MT) systems often fail to correctly translate gender, especially when converting from a gender-neutral language like English to a gendered target language such as Romanian.
By Ioana Grigore, Sergiu Nisioi
arXiv:2608.28924v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Linguistic theory has long recognized cross-linguistic syntactic regularities, leading to claims that these similar structures are processed by similar...
By Sasha Boguraev, Toshiki Nakai, Kyle Mahowald, Julius Steuer
arXiv:2606. 30152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contextual language models conflate grammatical gender and social semantic bias in gendered languages such as Spanish.
By Huanping Xiao, Yingji Li
This article tackles an important phenomenon in the syntax of Yemeni Ibbi Arabic (YIA), viz. , wh-agreement, a phenomenon common to several languages including Greek, Indonesian, Lubukusu, Irish, etc.
The paper investigates gender bias in machine translation evaluation metrics using an occupation-balanced subset of GAMBIT+ across seven English‑source language pairs, including a new German extension. It finds that masculine translations tend to receive higher scores and that biases align with stereotypical gender representations, though the strength varies by evaluator and language. The study highlights that assessing bias requires multiple dimensions beyond a single aggregate measure.
By Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Giorgos Filandrianos, Wafaa Mohammed, Giuseppe Attanasio, Chrysoula Zerva
arXiv:2608. 13328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Professional communication is increasingly mediated by LLMs - but do these models serve all users equally?
By Katherine Van Koevering, Anjalie Field
arXiv:2603. 23485v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Standard evaluation practices assume that large language model (LLM) outputs are stable when prompts are embedded in contextually equivalent discourses.
By Sagar Kumar, Ariel Flint, Luca Maria Aiello, Andrea Baronchelli
The article examines how Byte‑Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenization handles Polish, an inflectional language, and finds that BPE tends to stabilize frequent surface fragments of grammatical exponents rather than true grammatical categories. It introduces the concept of grammatical form anchoring, showing that certain Polish verb forms can signal the speaking subject without an explicit pronoun, and highlights that language models may lack a stable grammatical "I" and can shift gender or mirror user forms. The study proposes Roclawski’s segmentation‑flexional forms as a diagnostic framework and suggests that more stable Polish modeling would require sublexical stabilization, anchoring grammatical form in the inflectional system, and maintaining the grammatical "I" in dialogue.
By Elzbieta Dawidek (University of Lower Silesia DSW Ideis)
arXiv:2607. 23319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard subword tokenization algorithms such as Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and SentencePiece are trained predominantly on modern language corpora and produce inefficient segmentations when applied to classical Indian languages.
By Poornima Kumaresan, Pavithra Muruganantham, Lakshmi Rajendran, Santhosh Sivasubramani
The study investigates how speech‑to‑speech (S2S) models handle gender, distinguishing between the acoustic voice and the content’s gender cues. Experiments across five models in English, Spanish, and Mandarin show that while the rendered voice remains unbiased, the models consistently attribute speaker gender based on textual content rather than voice. When content and voice disagree, misgendering rates soar to 90%, whereas agreement yields only 2% misgendering.
By Xiaoqun Liu, Tanu Mitra, Harshit Rajgarhia, Abhishek Mukherji