arXiv:2608. 08606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine translation (MT) systems often fail to correctly translate gender, especially when converting from a gender-neutral language like English to a gendered target language such as Romanian.
By Ioana Grigore, Sergiu Nisioi
arXiv:2603. 23485v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Standard evaluation practices assume that large language model (LLM) outputs are stable when prompts are embedded in contextually equivalent discourses.
By Sagar Kumar, Ariel Flint, Luca Maria Aiello, Andrea Baronchelli
arXiv:2607. 20073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-based recruitment systems that rely on machine learning models trained on historical CV data, risk perpetuating and amplifying social biases.
By Farnaz Faramarzi Lighvan, Lynn Houthuys
The paper investigates gender bias in machine translation evaluation metrics using an occupation-balanced subset of GAMBIT+ across seven English‑source language pairs, including a new German extension. It finds that masculine translations tend to receive higher scores and that biases align with stereotypical gender representations, though the strength varies by evaluator and language. The study highlights that assessing bias requires multiple dimensions beyond a single aggregate measure.
By Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Giorgos Filandrianos, Wafaa Mohammed, Giuseppe Attanasio, Chrysoula Zerva
arXiv:2311.13892v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The social biases and unwelcome stereotypes revealed by pretrained language models are becoming obstacles to their application. Compared to n...
By Bingkang Shi, Xiaodan Zhang, Dehan Kong, Yulei Wu, Zongzhen Liu, Honglei Lyu, Longtao Huang
The paper introduces a unified framework that simultaneously measures intrinsic (encoded) and extrinsic (expressed) gender bias in large language models using identical neutral prompts. It finds a consistent link between latent gender information and output bias, but shows that alignment via supervised fine‑tuning reduces expressed bias while leaving internal gender associations largely intact and reactivatable by adversarial prompts. The study also demonstrates that debiasing gains on structured benchmarks may not transfer to realistic tasks such as story generation.
By Nour Bouchouchi, Thibault Laugel, Xavier Renard, Christophe Marsala, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Marcin Detyniecki
arXiv:2512. 00807v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) inherit significant social biases from their training data, notably in gender representation.
By Yujie Lin, Jiayao Ma, Qingguo Hu, Wenbo Li, Genji Li, Derek Wong, Jinsong Su
The paper investigates how in‑context learning (ICL) in large vision‑language models (LVLMs) can amplify gender bias. Using the VL‑BICLE framework, the authors show that gendered ICL demonstrations shift model bias toward the demonstrated gender, especially in tasks involving gendered language such as image captioning and pronoun prediction. They find that similarity‑based retrieval does not mitigate this bias and that replacing real images with synthetic ones from stable diffusion reduces bias without hurting caption quality.
By Tong Xiang, Noa Garcia, Yuta Nakashima
Face--voice association models may rely on language or gender cues in the voice rather than on speaker-specific voice characteristics, which can lead to a performance deterioration when the model has...
arXiv:2609.15608v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Detecting sexism on the internet is a fundamentally subjective task; our team, VANGUARD, addresses this challenge in the EXIST 2026 Task 2 by proposi...
By Ana-Maria Luisa Mocanu, Sebastian Mocanu, Ciprian-Octavian Truic\u{a}, Elena-Simona Apostol
arXiv:2609.17913v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Face--voice association models may rely on language or gender cues in the voice rather than on speaker-specific voice characteristics, which can lead t...
By Marta Moscati, Swapnil Khandoker, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Shah Nawaz, Fatima Noor, Rohan Kumar Das, Mubashir Noman, Junaid Mir, Muhammad Haroon Yousaf, Khalid Malik, Markus Schedl
arXiv:2608. 04056v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When people label text for sexism, they often disagree, and not because some of them are wrong: they genuinely perceive sexism differently.
By Hadi Mohammadi, Tina Shahedi, Robert A. Bagheri, Mehdi Dastani, Masoume M. Raeissi