DiPS: Dialogue Policy Selection for High-Stakes Persuasion Agents
arXiv:2607. 01557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with persuasion in high-stakes scenarios.
arXiv:2607. 01557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with persuasion in high-stakes scenarios.
arXiv:2601. 02871v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Task-oriented proactive dialogue agents play a pivotal role in recruitment, particularly for steering conversations towards specific business outcomes, such as acquiring social-media contacts for private-channel conversion.
arXiv:2608. 15949v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use as conversational recommender systems (CRS), demonstrating strong recommendation accuracy and natural dialogue.
arXiv:2608. 20331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized interpretation of medical reports has emerged as an increasingly important need among patients.
arXiv:2412.15957v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has transformed many industries, including healthcare. In practice, hospitals and patie...
arXiv:2608. 12062v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Developing dialogue systems capable of engaging in multi-turn, goal-oriented conversations remains a significant challenge, especially in specialized domains with limited data.
Personalized interpretation of medical reports has emerged as an increasingly important need among patients. Addressing this need requires both evidence-grounded medical factuality and context-dependent patient communication, yet existing medical vision-language tasks do not adequately capture these dual requirements.
arXiv:2510.13387v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with strategic persuasion, largely because existing approaches either neglect information asymmetry or...
arXiv:2606. 03812v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operational safety in high-stakes domains such as industrial process control, autonomous, and safety-critical systems, demand reliable hazard identification.
arXiv:2606. 08497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As deep language models (DLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, understanding their decision rationale becomes paramount for ensuring trust, safety, and accountability.
The paper introduces “Persuasio”, a multi‑agent dialogue platform that uses a formal argumentation theory to adjudicate winners in free‑text debates. Using this system, the authors generated 192 debates on a UK political topic involving humans and large language models (LLMs), and evaluated 22 interlocutors through automated adjudication and 9,702 crowdsourced pairwise judgments across 1,386 annotation instances. The results show a consistent decoupling between subjective persuasiveness—where LLMs dominate—and formal argumentative strength—where humans remain competitive, with multi‑agent and retrieval‑augmented variants widening this gap.
Dialogue systems in e-commerce scenarios often need to satisfy multiple objectives: accurately reasoning over user profiles (e. g.