arXiv:2609.38028v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autonomous vehicles interacting with passengers through natural language must reason beyond immediate commands. Passenger intent may span multiple st...
By Parthib Roy, Yash Tandon, Marcus Blennemann, Giovanni Tapia Lopez, Angel Martinez-Sanchez, Mohan M. Trivedi, Ross Greer
The paper introduces DriveMind, a large-scale driving Visual Question Answering corpus that aligns chain-of-thought reasoning with trajectory planning. Experiments with Vision‑Language Model agents show a causal disconnect: removing navigation priors significantly harms planning, while removing the chain-of-thought has little effect. The authors propose the Reasoning‑Planning Decoupling Hypothesis and present a training‑free probe to assess an agent’s reliance on priors.
By Xurui Song, Shuo Huai, JingJing Jiang, Jiayi Kong, Jun Luo
arXiv:2609.05834v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: World models promise a general route to embodied intelligence: learn predictive dynamics once, then reason, plan, and act with them. Increasingly, the...
By Todd Y. Zhou, Daniel Zhang
arXiv:2610.17310v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-model agents are expected to adapt to others whose behavior changes through interaction. Yet adaptation may rely on learned behavioral pattern...
By Hanbo Xie, Yue Zhao, Robert C. Wilson
arXiv:2610.07954v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-based trajectory predictors represent coordinates as discrete tokens and learn auxiliary tasks such as destination and group reasoning. This f...
By JunGyu Lee, Inhwan Bae, Hae-Gon Jeon
arXiv:2607. 04681v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Embodied Chain-of-Thought has emerged as a promising mechanism to enhance robot decision-making and interpretability in black-box Vision-Language Action (VLA) models.
By Matthew Foutter, Matteo Cercola, Lena Wild, Yunshan Wang, Michelle Li, Daniele Gammelli, Marco Pavone
MotiveMob is a motivation-driven autoregressive framework for generating human mobility trajectories. It models the "why-where-when" decision process by first predicting a plausible motivation for each movement step and then jointly generating the next location and arrival time. The approach is evaluated under user-level and temporal distribution shifts, including seasonal changes and COVID-19 disruptions, and consistently outperforms pretraining- and prompting-based baselines in distributional fidelity.
By Mengkun Gao, Zengqing Wu, Renhe Jiang, Jiawei Wang, Yusong Wang, Chuang Yang, Shuyuan Zheng, Makoto Onizuka, Chuan Xiao
The paper analyzes state‑of‑the‑art vehicle trajectory predictors and finds that many surrounding agents actually worsen prediction accuracy. Using Shapley attribution, it shows models learn unstable, non‑causal decision schemes that vary across training runs. The authors introduce a Conditional Information Bottleneck that compresses agent features and ignores unhelpful ones, improving accuracy and robustness across datasets and architectures.
By Daniel Jost, Luca Paparusso, Martin Stoll, J\"org Wagner, Raghu Rajan, Joschka B\"odecker
arXiv:2606. 31106v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale datasets and fast simulators have enabled improvements in driving policies that appear safe and robust, yet strong performance in nominal scenarios can still mask flawed reasoning and unsafe heuristics.
By Hyeonchang Jeon, Kyungbeom Kim, Eugene Vinitsky, Kyung-Joong Kim
arXiv:2606. 05130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Individual-level mobility prediction is central to urban simulation, transportation planning, and policy analysis.
By Linyao Chen, Qinlao Zhao, Zechen Li, Mingming Li, Likun Ni, Jinyu Chen, Yuhao Yao, Xuan Song, Noboru Koshizuka, Hiroki Kobayashi
The paper argues that current embodied vision‑language planning benchmarks favor linguistic next‑token prediction over physically grounded next‑state reasoning, leading models to rely on language priors rather than true causal dependencies. To address this, the authors introduce Causal‑Plan‑Bench, a diagnostic suite covering four causal dimensions, and Causal‑Plan‑1M, a million‑scale corpus of explicit causal reasoning traces extracted from egocentric videos. Extensive experiments show that existing models perform poorly on these tasks, while a new model trained with a tailored recipe—Causal Planner based on Qwen3‑VL‑8B—achieves significant gains, demonstrating the feasibility of physically grounded causal reasoning.
By Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie, Wanqi Zhong, Hanwen Cui, Zirui Song, Lijie Wang, Chong Luo, Bei Liu, Yiming Li
arXiv:2609.17064v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Assistive autonomous systems must anticipate human goals before an observed behavior is complete. This article formulates anticipation as goal inferenc...
By Farnaz Soleimani (LISSI), Abdelghani Chibani (LISSI), Yacine Amirat (LISSI), Ghazaleh Khodabandelou (LISSI)