arXiv Machine Learning By Daniel Jost, Luca Paparusso, Martin Stoll, J\"org Wagner, Raghu Rajan, Joschka B\"odecker

Super Agents and Confounders: Influence of surrounding agents on vehicle trajectory prediction

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper analyzes state‑of‑the‑art vehicle trajectory predictors and finds that many surrounding agents actually worsen prediction accuracy. Using Shapley attribution, it shows models learn unstable, non‑causal decision schemes that vary across training runs. The authors introduce a Conditional Information Bottleneck that compresses agent features and ignores unhelpful ones, improving accuracy and robustness across datasets and architectures.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 17

DriveJudge: Rethinking Autonomous Driving Evaluation with Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2606. 17362v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous driving has shifted towards end-to-end policy learning, where reliable, interpretable policy evaluation is a fundamental challenge as driving quality is highly context-dependent.

By Xinglong Sun, Kevin Xie, Jenny Schmalfuss, Despoina Paschalidou, Xiuming Zhang, Sanja Fidler, Kashyap Chitta, Jose M. Alvarez
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Driving, Fast or Slow? Neuro-Symbolic Guidance for Motion Prediction in Multi-Modal Ground Mobility

arXiv:2606. 15251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate and interpretable motion prediction for heterogeneous traffic spaces, including pedestrians, bicycles, cars, and trucks, is essential for safe autonomous navigation.

By Simon Kohaut, Felix Divo, Julius Hahnewald, Benedict Flade, Julian Eggert, Kristian Kersting, Devendra Singh Dhami
arXiv AI
Oct 9

More Than Meets the Eye? Uncovering the Reasoning-Planning Disconnect in Training Vision-Language Driving Models

The paper introduces DriveMind, a large-scale driving Visual Question Answering corpus that aligns chain-of-thought reasoning with trajectory planning. Experiments with Vision‑Language Model agents show a causal disconnect: removing navigation priors significantly harms planning, while removing the chain-of-thought has little effect. The authors propose the Reasoning‑Planning Decoupling Hypothesis and present a training‑free probe to assess an agent’s reliance on priors.

By Xurui Song, Shuo Huai, JingJing Jiang, Jiayi Kong, Jun Luo