AI safety and alignment

Alignment, interpretability, red-teaming, bias and privacy: the research on what these systems do when they misbehave.

17,896 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Aug 18

LLM Safety Alignment in Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review

arXiv:2608. 14626v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved substantial progress in safety alignment, yet their safety guarantees remain significantly weaker in low-resource and multilingual settings than in high-resource languages.

By Valdini Douglace Lemofouet, Blessing Ngozi Uzor, Paula Chikaodinaka Anyanwu, Danielle Blanche Kapsa, Sukairaj Hafiz Imam, P Sam Sahil, Abigail Oppong, Tassallah Abdullahi, Clemencia Siro, Idris Abdulmumin, Seid Muhie Yimam, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Multi-Modal Generative Fuzzy System: Fuzzy Inference Guided Large Model Interactive Question Answering Framework

arXiv:2608. 14584v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Multimodal Question Answering (MQA), models are required to jointly encode and integrate heterogeneous information from multiple modalities, including text, images, and speech, to perform complex semantic reasoning and decision making.

By Hailong Yang, Jianqi Wang, Guanjin Wang, Zhaohong Deng
arXiv AI
Aug 18

From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents

The paper introduces RUPA, a trajectory‑level uncertainty quantification framework for large language model agents. RUPA models an agent’s execution as a directed graph of reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback, then propagates uncertainty across this graph to capture long‑range dependencies. Experiments on benchmarks such as τ‑2, Terminal‑Bench‑2, and GAIA show that RUPA outperforms existing methods, enabling earlier failure detection and more reliable agent execution.

By Zhengzhao Ma. Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
arXiv AI
Aug 18

GRIP: Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises

GRIP (Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises) addresses the query dominance problem in retrieval-augmented generation by enforcing a capacity asymmetry: the decoder retains full access to the query while retrieved evidence is funneled through a severe stochastic bottleneck. This design forces the evidence channel to encode only residual information not present in the query. On five reasoning benchmarks, GRIP surpasses strong iterative baselines, reduces query–latent mutual information by about 30×, cuts hallucination by 73%, and its bottleneck outputs occupy subspaces less aligned with the query than baseline representations.

By Lirui Teng