Retrieval-augmented generation

Retrieval pipelines, vector search, chunking and reranking: how models are grounded in a corpus instead of their weights.

6,381 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

A Model with No Head and Many Thoughts

arXiv:2608.31069v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models decode by projecting hidden states through a large vocabulary head at every step. This operation is computationally costly and fo...

By Nikita Koriagin, Yaroslav Aksenov, George Bredis, Gleb Gerasimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
arXiv AI
Sep 1

RAGDiffusion++: From Macro-Retrieval to Micro-Fidelity Alignment for Garment Generation

RAGDiffusion++ advances garment generation by addressing the high‑frequency texture gap that previous retrieval‑augmented models left unresolved. The approach introduces a dual‑image FLUX architecture trained on a large, complex garment dataset, coupled with a new attribute‑aware reward model that guides reinforcement learning to favor realistic high‑frequency patterns. An adversarial‑regularized RL strategy (AR‑GRPO) further prevents artifact exploitation, ensuring the model samples authentic, detailed garment textures.

By Yuhan Li, Xianfeng Tan, Fangao Zeng, Wenxiang Shang, Pipei Huang, Hao Zhou, Zhiyu Jin, Wenjun Zhang, Bingbing Ni
arXiv AI
Sep 1

post-graph-rag: A PostgreSQL-Native Bi-Temporal Graph RAG Engine with Temporal Grounding at Synthesis

post-graph-rag is an open‑source PostgreSQL‑native engine that unifies chunks, embeddings, a canonical entity graph, and community summaries in a single database, using pgvector for search and edge tables for traversal. It validates extraction output—rejecting vague predicates, normalising predicates, resolving entities to unique vertices, and flagging negations—before writing, and employs a bi‑temporal layer to record when a relation held and when the system believed it, superseding incompatible earlier assertions. In benchmarks against LightRAG, it builds denser, more queryable graphs and achieves higher scores on LongMemEval, largely due to its temporal grounding in prompts.

By Chandan Rajah
arXiv AI
Sep 1

An Explainable Coherence Score for Detecting Temporal Inconsistencies in Political News

The paper presents the Temporal Coherence Score (TCS), a continuous, interpretable metric for detecting temporal inconsistencies in political news. TCS is computed through a four‑stage pipeline that extracts temporal facts, builds a temporal knowledge graph, verifies consistency using internal rules and external references, and aggregates scores with explanations. On a benchmark of 100 political articles with injected errors, TCS achieves 0.909 precision, providing detailed explanations for each flagged inconsistency.

By Marius Nicusor Pantea, Adrian Groza
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Flow-JEPA: Flow Matching for Robust Latent Dynamics in JEPA World Models

Flow-JEPA introduces a conditional flow matching dynamics model that generates a sequence of future latent states conditioned on current observations and actions, replacing deterministic autoregressive prediction with stochastic trajectory-level prediction. By using a Gaussian flow source, the model learns to transport perturbed latent trajectories toward clean future representations while remaining within the reconstruction‑free JEPA framework. The approach improves mean success rates from 86% to 92% under clean observations and from 67% to 86% under noisy conditions.

By Yanchen Huo, Ziying Song, Yadan Luo
arXiv AI
Sep 1

AgenticRag-R1: Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Stack Memory for Multi-Step Reasoning, Retrieval and Memorizing

AgenticRag‑R1 is a reinforcement‑learning framework that integrates reasoning, retrieval, and memory through a stack and fine‑grained action space. It uses hierarchical action‑aware rewards and an information‑aware trajectory rejection strategy to support long‑horizon learning. Experiments on multi‑hop, open‑domain, and agentic reasoning benchmarks show that AgenticRag‑R1 outperforms strong baselines and produces robust, interpretable, memory‑aware reasoning behaviors.

By Xinke Jiang, Yue Fang, Zhibang Yang, Jiaran Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Tao Feng, Rihong Qiu, Wentao Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Ruizhe Zhang, Yongxin Xu, Yuheng Huang, Xu Chu, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang