Retrieval-augmented generation

Retrieval pipelines, vector search, chunking and reranking: how models are grounded in a corpus instead of their weights.

6,381 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Learning Concepts, Not Tokens: Self-Supervised Semantic Alignment for Language Models

The paper proposes a self‑supervised framework that trains language models to predict concepts—sets of semantically equivalent tokens—rather than single tokens. This approach improves alignment with human similarity judgments, boosts performance on classification, clustering, and reranking tasks, and yields comparable or stronger downstream reasoning while lowering perplexity on semantically meaningful words and only slightly increasing overall perplexity.

By Christine Zhang, Dan Jurafsky, Chen Shani
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 1

Beyond Chain-of-Thought: Rewrite as a Universal Interface for Generative Multimodal Embeddings

arXiv:2604.22280v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a promising foundation for universal multimodal embeddings. Recent studies have shown that...

By Peixi Wu, Ke Mei, Feipeng Ma, Bosong Chai, Zhibin Lan, Chenxi Zhao, Shannan Yan, Jie Chen, Zhangchi Hu, Yansong Peng, Bo Lin, Junjie Zhou, Dacheng Yin, Tianyi Wang, Fengyun Rao, Jing Lyu, Hebei Li, Xiaoyan Sun
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Efficient GPU Retrieval for Semantic Search

The paper introduces a GPU‑optimized retrieval framework for LinkedIn’s semantic search, partitioning embeddings into eight category‑supervised segments and applying a min/median aggregation rule aligned with the existing relevance policy. A lightweight Stage‑1 scorer generates high‑recall candidates, while a two‑stage GPU architecture—FP8 coarse ranking followed by FP16 re‑ranking—boosts throughput and recall, achieving 99.6‑99.8% of full‑FP16 recall at over 500 QPS per shard. In A/B testing, the system raises exploratory‑query Precision@10 from 63.7% to 79.0% and navigational Precision@1 from 65.5% to 74.7%, with human evaluation confirming the improvement.

By Dhritiman Das, Chujie Zheng, Ronak Kaoshik, Pratik Dixit, Vishal Shah, Yanbo Li, Jiahao Xu, Manika Agarwal, Chinmay Naik, Lingyu Zhang, Chetan Bhole, Chirag Bhanuprasad Mehta, Meng Zheng, Puneet Singh Ahluwalia, Shirisha Singh, Ping Jin, Manas Apte, Gokulraj Mohanasundaram, Tugrul Bingol, Raghavan Muthuregunathan, Fedor Borisyuk
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

When Can We Work in Embedding Space? What Text Embeddings Preserve

The paper investigates when text embeddings can be reliably used as inputs for empirical analysis by formalizing the assumption that embeddings preserve essential information from the original text. Under a generative model where documents are mixtures of latent topics, the author examines two applications: clustering documents in embedding space and using embeddings as controls for high‑dimensional text. Empirical results on 363 U.S. metropolitan areas show that clusters derived from LLM‑generated economic descriptions capture interpretable economic archetypes and better distinguish local employment dynamics than alternative clustering methods or curated covariates.

By Simon Freyaldenhoven
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Reverse N-Wise Output-Oriented Testing for AI/ML and Quantum Computing Systems

The paper proposes reverse n‑wise output‑oriented testing for AI/ML and quantum computing systems, a method that builds covering arrays over output equivalence classes, confidence buckets, decision boundaries, fairness partitions, embedding clusters, ranking stability bands, quantum measurement distributions, and error syndrome patterns. It then uses gradient‑free metaheuristic optimization to solve the inverse mapping problem, generating input configurations or quantum circuit parameters that trigger specific behavioral signatures in opaque models. The framework claims to provide explicit coverage guarantees, higher fault detection rates for calibration, boundary, and error syndromes, improved test suite efficiency, and automated partition discovery for MLOps and quantum validation pipelines.

By Lamine Rihani
arXiv AI
Sep 1

When Images Look Right and Retrieve Wrong: Coverage-Guided Cross-Scale Re-Indexing for Knowledge-Faithful Generative Perception

The paper introduces CERES, a closed‑loop multimodal indexing framework that addresses semantic collapse in multimodal generation by building a three‑level semantic pyramid and using scale‑routed cross‑attention to generate images that remain retrievable by their original queries. CERES employs a co‑occurrence‑aware router, a lightweight U‑Net generator, and a soft‑Jaccard coverage objective to ensure generated images cover the intended concepts, verified by re‑indexing with a frozen vision‑language model and an external DINOv2 probe. Experiments on four pansharpening benchmarks show state‑of‑the‑art performance, especially under extreme scale variation, and significant improvements in concept‑query retrieval and image‑text ranking metrics.

By Guangyuan Dong, Chuang Liu, Haoyu Wang, Yangchen Zeng, Jiaqi Zhang, Li Jiuxing, Xiaoyang Yu, Pinlong Zhao, Yuchao Hou, Ziwei Li, Zheng Lin, Alexander Lim Han Yang, Yusen Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

BEACON: Behavioral and Semantic Enrichment of AlphaEarth Embeddings through Tri-Modal Contrastive Learning

BEACON is a tri‑modal contrastive learning framework that enriches AlphaEarth embeddings by aligning physical representations from Earth‑observation imagery with semantic POI text and human behavioral POI visitation data, while keeping the deployed model image‑only. In a Houston case study, BEACON outperformed six baselines on nine downstream tasks, achieving up to 43% higher R² for obesity prevalence, 34% for poor mental health, and 22% for median household income under a linear probe.

By Hao Tian, Heng Cai, Yifan Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 1

AgenticRag-R1: Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Stack Memory for Multi-Step Reasoning, Retrieval and Memorizing

AgenticRag‑R1 is a reinforcement‑learning framework that integrates reasoning, retrieval, and memory through a stack and fine‑grained action space. It uses hierarchical action‑aware rewards and an information‑aware trajectory rejection strategy to support long‑horizon learning. Experiments on multi‑hop, open‑domain, and agentic reasoning benchmarks show that AgenticRag‑R1 outperforms strong baselines and produces robust, interpretable, memory‑aware reasoning behaviors.

By Xinke Jiang, Yue Fang, Zhibang Yang, Jiaran Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Tao Feng, Rihong Qiu, Wentao Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Ruizhe Zhang, Yongxin Xu, Yuheng Huang, Xu Chu, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang