arXiv:2607. 01977v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ontology learning (OL) aims to automatically construct structured knowledge models from text, yet progress remains fragmented across methods, domains, and evaluation practices.
By Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, Andrei Aioanei, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, S\"oren Auer
The paper presents an automated framework for building ontology networks by discovering typed semantic links between concepts across domains. It uses domain‑adapted DistilBERT embeddings, clustering to prune candidates, and GPT‑4o for generating interpretable relationships, reducing 800k raw pairs to 95k high‑quality candidates. Human validation on 429 links shows an 80.19% precision and 0.890 F1, outperforming five similarity‑based baselines and demonstrating the need for LLM reasoning in ontology link construction.
By Nouha Hayouni, Sheeba Samuel, Alsayed Algergawy
arXiv:2609.10055v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Biomedical ontology normalization maps free-text expressions to standardized concepts, enabling consistent integration and analysis of biomedical dat...
By Jie Song, Zhichuan Xu, Ziyu Lu, Meng Xiao, Cheng Bi, Yuxin Zhang, Xin Zheng, Xiaoran Li, Qiongfang Cao, Hao Yang, Bairong Shen
Biomedical ontology normalization maps free-text expressions to standardized concepts, enabling consistent integration and analysis of biomedical data. This task remains challenging because lexical va...
The paper demonstrates that Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL) embeddings contain a natural coarse‑to‑fine hierarchy, with prefix length aligning to gold taxonomy granularity. By training a simple order‑embedding probe called PEEL on these frozen embeddings, the authors can recover high‑fidelity taxonomic DAGs from a concept vocabulary alone, achieving strong results on two OLLM benchmarks and transferring to new domains without target‑edge supervision. The study shows that pre‑trained retrieval embeddings encode a decodable granularity gradient, enabling a minimal probe to extract explicit parent‑child (is‑a) structure.
By Eunchan Kim, Inwhee Joe
The paper introduces MIOE, a causal‑abstraction benchmark designed to probe how large language models (LLMs) handle ontology engineering tasks such as entity typing and subsumption prediction. Using this benchmark, the authors evaluate several mechanistic interpretability methods—including SAE, DBM, and DAS—on Qwen3‑8B and Qwen3‑4B models, finding that distributed subspace interventions perform best but still mix with auxiliary class‑specific information. The study shows that while ontological predictions are accessible at a mechanistic level, current techniques do not yet isolate a clean, disentangled causal mechanism for ontological knowledge.
By Bohui Zhang, Albert Mero\~no-Pe\~nuela, Elena Simperl
arXiv:2609.08174v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We introduce OntologyBench, a tiered biomedical retrieval benchmark comprising 471,854 training and 125,744 evaluation query-document relevance pairs a...
By Xiao Yu Cindy Zhang, Wyeth Wasserman, Jian Zhu
arXiv:2609.34540v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Ontology Learning (OL) from text has advanced with the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), but it remains challenging due to the limited ava...
By Huu Tan Mai, Roman Kochnev, Cuong Xuan Chu, Lukas Lange, Heiko Paulheim, Daria Stepanova
The pro-team at LLMs4OL 2026 presented a system for ontology learning that tackles both the End-to-End Flagship Task (Task A) and the Ontology Extension Reuse Task (Task B). Their approach uses an offline retrieval‑augmented few‑shot prompting pipeline with Qwen2.5‑14B‑Instruct and MiniLM‑L6‑v2 for retrieval, selecting top‑5 examples for Task A and top‑2 for Task B, and applies a left‑truncated context‑windowing strategy to keep task instructions in long prompts. For Task B, generated triples are filtered deterministically by a vocabulary constraint, keeping triples that involve at least one term from the closed vocabulary and removing duplicates of the initial ontology, achieving high scores in Semantic Graph Similarity, Term‑Typing F1, and Taxonomy Discovery F1, though no non‑taxonomic relations were extracted.
By Shivam Mishra, Dhannu Ram Meena, Muneendra Ojha, Krishna Pratap Singh, Kuldeep Singh
arXiv:2605. 28965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Linking free-text phenotype descriptions to ontology terms, typically referred to as phenotype annotation, is essential for the cross-study integration of comparative morphological data.
By James P. Balhoff, Hilmar Lapp
arXiv:2606. 26130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to guide research methodology, yet their default methodological tendencies under minimal prompting remain unclear.
By Francesca Carlon, Brecht Verbeken, Vincent Ginis, Andres Algaba
The paper proposes a behavior-based fusion model that combines large language models (LLMs) with ontology rankers to improve rare-disease diagnosis. By examining ranked lists, agreement, and ontology support, the model learns how much to rely on each system per case, achieving significant recall gains on Phenopacket Store and RAMEDIS benchmarks. Importantly, the fused diagnoses retain candidate-level ontology evidence for inspection.
By Zhaoyang Jiang, Zhizhong Fu, Yunsoo Kim, Zicheng Li, Xuanqi Peng, Fei Teng, Jiacong Mi, Honghan Wu